this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
504 points (98.8% liked)

Funny

12588 readers
1060 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Tbh muscle-y dudes have never really done it for me

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

This might be my favorite comment on lemmy

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Thank goodness on behalf of dudes like me.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It depends. Muscle underneath a small layer of fat is amazing.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Makes sense. You need fat (energy) to build and maintain the muscles. Muscles get used as energy source first, fat second, because fat is for emergencies.* Which is why muscly without fat looks so fake (and ugly imo).

* At least that's what i was educated for cows as a farmer, no clue what the fitness guys learn nowadays.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, your body prefers fat as an energy source. Turning muscles into energy is a lot of effort for your metabolism, and building new muscles when you refeed also.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Uhm, no, it builds first fat, needs fat as an "ingredient" to build muscles (makes no sense to build all that muscle if you barely have enough energy to survive). Then burns preferably muscles. Fat is hard to convert, protein (muscle) is easily accessible (bodybuilders take protein as supplement). You need excercise and not just starving to lose weight, no?

And btw, even just keeping muscles needs more energy. Fat not.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago

needs fat as an "ingredient" to build muscles

No, muscle protein synthesis needs amino-acids. Fat is not used to build muscle

Then burns preferably muscles

No

Fat is hard to convert

Not nearly as hard as it is for the body to atrophy muscle mass, turn the proteins into amino-acids, and turn those amino-acids into glucose and then ATP

protein (muscle) is easily accessible (bodybuilders take protein as supplement)

It isn't, and the digestion of whey protein supplements can not be compared to muscle atrophy

You need excercise and not just starving to lose weight, no?

At this point I'm sure you're just trolling, because that couldn't be further from the truth

And btw, even just keeping muscles needs more energy

True

Fat not

Keeping fat cells also uses energy, just not nearly as much as muscle mass

If you wanna know my credibility on this topic I would suggest a look at my profile picture

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

At least that's what i was educated for cows as a farmer

Lmfao Yes.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Visually nothing; but being embraced by them is a whole 'nother story. I can practically feel my spine realigning just thinking about it.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago

being bisexual is being attracted to two very specific types of men, and all women- those being femboys and "i know it when i see it but it's certainly not muscle dudes"