I would like to say that the search for extraterrestrial life is scientifically feasible. The reason I am starting with this is because some in the scientific community are just starting to take it serious and not saying you're a quack for speaking on it.
I also want to mention that I am not one of the scientists who participated in the writing of this paper, however I do conduct my own independent research.
The reason for this is because I have witnessed one of these extraterrestrials several times over the past years. At first like most would I assumed they were UFOs in the common sense (spaceship from space) but it became clear to me that they were in fact energy (plasma) and a lifeforms.
This conclusion of mine predates the writing of the PDF by over a decade. I am only starting to see "catch up" in the scientific and governmental funded fields in the last 5 years.
I will end my statement with this. I can confirm without a doubt that extraterrestrials are on this planet. I cannot confirm if this is a good or bad thing.
P.S. i don't agree with 100% of the pdf
Cool. But scientists do science and understand the scientific method. There remains no evidence of extraterrestrial life anywhere, regardless of speculation about earth being special.
Agreed. No sane scientist will say it exists.
The strongest claim would be,. That it is less likely 0 life outside earth exist then some.
But what OP says is far more quack like, although traditionally quack is a term saved for medical lack of science. It feels right here.
As you say. His claim that extra terrestrial life Is on earth is not only without evidence. It opposes much evidence we do have. Like the limitations of distance or any other traveling life within our solar system.