this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
87 points (93.1% liked)

3DPrinting

20065 readers
87 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Some are genuine and trustworthy, but finding them is a needle in a haystack and Youtube will rarely lead you directly to them (because of course, it's not in their interest to do so). Others are at least transparent when they're being marketing tools. The ones that try to hide it and pretend to be "organic" when they're shilling trash are the worst.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you are genuine and trustworthy, you will never get a printer to review

[–] nullroot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Aurora tech is untrustworthy? What about my tech fun? Functional print Friday? There are definitely a handful of YouTubers I trust with a review of a 3d printing product, who have public review policies and take principled approaches. At least two of these are pillars of the community and it's a huge boon to the company to even have a review from that reviewer, even if it isn't glowing.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

What about my tech fun?

Tech is fun.

[–] fluxx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

He's OK, but he's still in it to make money, not just for fun.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why isn't it in YouTube's best interest? They don't care if the product gets praised or trashed, they aren't selling it, you watch the video/ ads and they're happy

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

Youtubers need content. That means advanced releases of new electronics. You can't get that unless every 'review' is positive.

Fuck Unbox Therapy and Lewis Hilsenteger he started the enshitification of YouTube.

[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It costs money for them to attempt to sort between honest/upfront advertising and the scummy kind.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I misinterpreted your original comment saying that YouTube wouldn't lead you directly to them to mean that it would stear you away from them (which would of course require them to do the sorting you're talking about). Yeah they don't really give a shit, just shovel whatever they think will get you to engage.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

YT has black boxes at all major ISPs. These cache local content. They prioritize what gets shown based on what is cached. This is why YT changed drastically around 2017. It is why you do not see content from ultra niche and high quality sources at random or get into advanced education like happened in the past.