this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
757 points (99.1% liked)

politics

26086 readers
3057 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Of course they are, they're all Nazis too.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MumboJumbo@lemmy.world 221 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Men 18-40 spouting racist, bigoted, and antisemitic things are "young boys".

However, when it's girls, minors, that are sexually assaulted, they are "young women."

That really is quite the uncomfortable double standard.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 95 points 4 days ago

Until they get older and get a job where they need to be taken seriously. Then they'll transition to girls again.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Vocabulary matters. You're pointing to a very similar journalistic/political bias. The most obvious of which is that "Israeli citizen slaughtered by terrorists!" vs. "253 Palestinians lost after strategic Israeli strike"

My favorite is the "Israeli Kidnapped from tank". Not even kidding.

Describing IDF soldiers and illegal settlers (prisoners of war) as "hostages" vs. Palestinian children, adults, all held without trial by Israel in what could only be described as concentration camps, as "prisoners".

Once you start noticing this type of passive/active language bias you start to recognize it everywhere.

Some of it is unconscious. A result of living in patriarchy and white supremacy. Most often from normies that have been trained to use that language. But, when it comes to media, it is almost always intentional to manufacture concent for the narrative they are trying to form.

Check out "title history" of news articles and you'll see in real time how this language adapts to the response of viewers or internal critics trying to ensure the correct conclusion is reached by the reader.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Followup for those interested: read Manufactured Consent. This world has been poisoned by people with evil deep in their hearts and malice on their tongues.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

When you have two major political parties and both are politically Right Wing, Manufactured Consent starts to feel normal to people.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago

Sort of like how RFK Jr could just dismiss sexual assault allegations from when he was in his mid 40s as being part of being a "very rambunctious youth."

[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago

These absolute garbage individuals literally called rape epic, the double standard is coming from them and the people in their party who excuse it, and then the media normalizes it.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Men 18-40 spouting racist, bigoted, and antisemitic things

Is evolution working as intended...

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3029708/

The same neurotransmitter (oxytocin) that causes love, humans to group up, and not be repulsed by incredibly disgusting kids...

Causes (especially for straight men) an intense hatred for literally anyone who you weren't socialized as a toddler around because they ain't "us". They're "them" or an out-group.

That's why the right goes so hard against diversity in media, why they lost their shit over Drag story hour.

Because humans are animals, and if we're not properly socialized as children, shit goes all Lord of the Flies, every time. You want a generation of racist white guys who hate anyone that ain't straight? You need to shield them completely from everything that's not that during their formative years, and that's what the right has been doing.

Everyone wants to pretend they pick random shit, but the people driving it are obscenely wealthy, and even if they're not smart enough to figure out the psychology, they'll pay someone to do it.

And for decades neoliberals played I to it, because they're paid by the same wealthy people to keep everyone divided.

We gave up on the kids, and it's gonna be impossible to win the lost ones back. We can still teach them critical thinking, but in 40 years when they're 60, they're gonna be a new maga. Just from how the normal aging process works. As we lose mental ability, we fall back on ingroup/outgroup.

Gen alpha is a boomer timebomb waiting to happen...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Gen alpha is a boomer timebomb waiting to happen…

It might be even much worse if the algorithms are allowed to continue unabated and people do less and less civic-minded things, in person. I think part of the thesis of "Bowling for Columbine" is that starting some time ago, lots and lots of people doing things within their community as groups, in-person has had a steep drop-off.

I think I remember Masons talking about how boomers were almost missing from many of their lodges. Not sure of the reason for that, but due to things like Dan Brown, there was an uptick among Gen X joining up. I still think it's probably way down for community groups of all kinds, generation after generation.

At least boomers are the ones still showing up to many in-person things. I don't know what the civic engagement is for Gen X and younger...also, the boomers had a lot of fantastic ideas, some of the first to really go mainstream was with their generation. I think many of them were some of the first to be socialized in the broader sense, too. It's just that Ronnie Raygunism came along and started building things like Faux and hate radio to capture that demo in particular...but I'm not fooled by the common trope of the boomer stereotype we keep seeing and blaming it all on them. I think that's overlooking a lot by using a convenient scapegoat, especially now that most of the Silent Generation is disappearing, and nearly all (?) of the Greatest Generation is gone.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is why I believe that building up community spaces is truly the way forward.

Mutual aid is the foundation of society, but we Americans have let that part of our culture deteriorate and instead promoted the "self-made individual" as the heroic ideal.

Although it doesn't seem vital, promoting pro-social spaces is critical to getting people to engage with their community and expand the "tribe" to include more degrees of separation.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I've often wondered about the physical spaces of churches - not the mega-churches, I'm talking about the ones that mostly seem to be sitting empty, as xtianity is dwindling in this country.

I wonder about some kind of mass movement that could be turned to using those spaces for more and more civic and secular activities that are not affiliated with the church (but maybe find some way to offset the costs of the church - pay some nominal rental fee, etc) set up as a neutral meeting ground.

Things like maker spaces, meetups of all kinds (think meetup.com), game nights, etc. Ideally, every day/night of the week not already reserved for something in the church.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 3 days ago

Reagan was a product of the newly established Southern Strategy, which has turned out to be very successful in its goals.

[–] Cenzorrll@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I think it was 24-40, not 18. Soo yeah.