this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
977 points (99.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35315 readers
4357 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 44 points 1 week ago (3 children)

lol i love how the abstract cites a paper from 1942

look: if you're disgusted by genitals, i'm sorry to hear that, and i'm not judging you.

but don't sit there and try to tell me everyone, or even "most people" feels that way.

i can't speak for goofy looking dicks, but vulvas are extremely attractive; i dunno wtf you, or your 1942 paper referencing "study" are talking about.

again--i'm not judging. but i suggest you post to asklemmy (or literally any other forum), and ask: "are female genitalia no fun to look at/unattractive/weird/whatever tf else" and consider that maybe whatever problem you have with vaginas might not be a baked in instinctual thing that everyone has

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 14 points 6 days ago

puritans

explains a ton

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Some vulvas are pretty. Most aren't. Some do smell weird, I imagine most will in the right wrong set of conditions. I like going down on them, but it isn't because of their beauty.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

YOU WANT TO DROWN IN SHEMEN DINT YOU?

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The paper from 1942 was meant to establish long standing scientific curiosity about the topic, you.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you goober.

you will never quantify an inherently subjective (qualitative) experience. the fact that you're trying to, and then calling me "goober" is quite enough for me to say: best of luck, tiger

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I agree with you, but you have to put forward a point that doesn’t stand atop misunderstanding a citation, or else I’ll name you another foodstuff

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wait, goober is a foodstuff?

???

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Another name for a peanut. Not sure how it became a soft pejorative, but I’m a fan

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What?

I've literally never heard of goober as meaning peanut.

I thought it basically just meant 'glob' when describing a physical thing, and when describing a person, basically the same as 'derpy', like uh, silly, absent minded, something like that, and is mostly meant in an at least semi endearing way.

[–] croizat@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It's why the Goofy Goober from SpongeBob is a peanut (there's also a peanut candy called goobers)

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It’s a borrowed African word. Borrowed in the 1800s. Borrowed by Americans. Borrowed. But it eventually shifted at some point in the last century to the definition most people are familiar with, though I can’t figure out how or why.

perhaps you are looking for the word loanword can i lend it to you?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

Huh, well TIL, thanks!

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you will never quantify an inherently subjective (qualitative) experience

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago

Objective truth, ungoober’d