this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
543 points (99.3% liked)

Linux

48186 readers
1873 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why is RISC-V significant? I'm completely out of the loop and have only heard of it in passing.

[–] andruid@lemmy.ml 115 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Open standard CPU instruction set. Meaning people can design new chips for it without needing to enter an expensive license agreement.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

I would have thought the license agreement would be one of the least expensive parts of making modern high-performance chips.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] rist097@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because it's an open Instruction Set Architecture.

Many different companies used to design their own CPU IS architectures in the past like (MIPS, AVR, PIC, ...) and of course the most popular ARM. Downside of this is that the software and ecosystems between these architectures are not compatible. Effort wasted in porting a library to one architecture cannot be always reused for another.

Recently we see a lot of companies adopting RiscV, and there is a big collaboration between them to ratify the specification and provide software support. This will in turn accelerate the development, and software and hardware support will hopefully overtake ARM in the future.

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And Apple will get to do a fourth architecture migration

[–] Bene7rddso@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not really counting the 6502, since I don't think Apple ever bothered with emulation or backwards compatibility for it once they moved to 68000.

[–] MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought their old PowerPc architecture was risc

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Indeed it was. Different RISC ISA though.

[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

This is for my own clarification, and anyone else that is confused by the terminology here.

In the mid- or late 1990s, I took a processor design class, and RISC was "Reduced Instruction Set Computer", a generic term for the direction processors were going at the time - even though they had a reduced set of instructions, and therefore had to process more instructions, they could run faster overall because the simplification meant they processed each individual instruction that much more quickly. (IIRC the class textbook was written by the people who had designed the MIPS processor.)

It was my understanding that the speed limitations in the traditional "complex" (CISC) processors were then overcome, so that processor design philosophy continues as well (in particular, x86 architecture is still CISC).

Now, I'm looking this up on Wikipedia: Okay, RISC-V is a set of instructions for a processor, and there are multiple open-source processors that implement RISC-V.

This announcement is that Debian now will theoretically run on those processors. Cool!

[–] wiki_me@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

It's an open standard that enables open source implementation (and several industry supported options exist), most notably IMO xiangshan and vroom

[–] nix@merv.news 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] nix@merv.news 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] curioushom@lemmy.one 27 points 1 year ago

It's still a good thing. It's an open specification, so anyone creating a design that is compliant can use software targeted at RISC-V. Just like you can buy USB-C flash drive from any manufacturer and use it with any OS that supports USB mass storage!

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Because we’re getting risc one way or another and the two targets are risc-v and arm. All the phones, tablets, mini pcs and apple made the jump to either arm or risc-v.