this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
749 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

8932 readers
546 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 91 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The one that lists sheets is at least using a verifiable metric. It's better than the "right rolls of unspecified size are more than 39 different rolls of unspecified size".

Still silly because no one knows how many sheets they use before changing the roll, but at least it's reasonable silly.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 30 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Isn't it the same problem tho, since they can make the sheets smaller and say there's more without actually offering a longer roll?

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We need legally defined toilet paper roll standards.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lets setup some ISO standards for shit wipers.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

I would be shocked if there isn't already one. The trick is getting companies to adhere to it.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Helps that they tend to be square-ish, there's a subsection of people who would notice immediately if you can't fold perfect paper cranes from a single sheet while you're pooping.

[–] Lojcs@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

pretty sure they are rectangles

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Oh, totally. It's by no means a good measurement, it's just the only one that's in some way tied to anything tangible. "8=39" doesn't mean anything.

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Which matters more total kg or mm^2^ ?

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Kg for sure, i wouldn't trust tp with a low cost per mm²

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

I also don't trust a toilet paper with a low gsm.

Maybe we need both a gsm and total weight labeling.

[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The label usually says total surface area in the package. The stores near me break the price down to cost per unit of area, as well. This really untangles the 'how much should I pay for a quadrahedroll vs a dodecca butt sphere" worth of paper?

[–] ArchEngel@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Username checks out!