this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
224 points (99.6% liked)

politics

26471 readers
2199 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Trump was expecting a poorly spoken non-white to match his biases, instead got Mamdani who is extremely well spoken.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Obama was too and that didn't stop him. Trump expects Mamdani to become a MAGA pickme.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

Not really.

It doesn't have to be deeper than Mamdani saying:

____ will make NYC love you

trump would (figuratively) pay any price for that, it's what he's wanted his entire life. The wealthy NYers will never accept him, so he can piss them off and get some kind of authentic goodwill for his hometown?

trump could absolutely be talked into that short term.

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 15 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Fuck. I hope he doesn’t do a Fetterman. Afettered, if you’ll indulge me.

[–] Impound4017@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean, Fetterman had some questionable views even before the point that most acknowledged that he’d flipped, he simply got less coverage than Mamdani and had the benefit of running against Dr. Oz so a lot of it was missed/overlooked. I think it’s significantly less likely that Mamdani flips because, to my understanding, he’s been very consistent in his views for quite a while now, even from the time before he was in office.

That said, if Mamdani flipped I could see it doing significant damage to the left on the basis of perception alone, so it could be that I’m just praying the left won’t be… fettered, by another pretender giving progressive policy a wrongfully bad name.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He's not even in office yet and us on the left are already trying to purity test his actions.

Jesus Christ, let's judge Zohran & his team by their policy actions when they take office. Anything until then is just rampant speculation that'll only serve the far-right and the foreign interest and big-money interest astroturfing bots trying to divide the left again!

[–] Impound4017@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 days ago

I don’t really know what I put there that qualifies as purity testing? If it’s the final paragraph, I should say that it was intended to be unserious; I just wanted an excuse to continue the ‘fetter’ bit.

As stated, I think the situation is very unlikely, to the point that it’s not worth seriously considering unless we have a demonstrable, compelling reason to believe that a flip is presently happening. My point was rather to say that Fetterman’s flip was less unexpected than it would initially seem given what information existed at the time, and if he’d gotten the kind of attention Mamdani did when he was running, it likely wouldn’t have been as surprising as it ended up being. Conversely, however, even after the intense scrutiny Mamdani has received from both the media and people on the left and right, it would be a genuine surprise to me if he was being anything other than truthful about his beliefs and intentions, and so the two aren’t really directly comparable. It is speculation, yes, but it’s not as if it’s entirely baseless, and it leads into the conclusion of ‘all we can do is wait and see. There’s not a reason to be worried at this time, but there are plenty of reasons to be hopeful.’

Plus (and to your point), even if Mamdani turned out to be less progressive or less effective than I’d hoped, so long as he’s this side of sane about the current fascist takeover, then I’d say we should count him as an ally, regardless of anything else mentioned.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I did not expect this retort. It’s quite a fettering I’ve experienced.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is Fetteral assault. I need an adult.

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago

You win. I give up. I’m all fettered out.

[–] DaMummy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Obama wasn't.......uhhh......that great...........of a.......uggggghhh.........speaker.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Those "uhh"s are a competent person thinking through how each thing they say could be misinterpreted and changing the language on the fly. He knew anything he said that could even be taken slightly as offensive to the right would dominate the news cycle for the next week. Its just sad that trump and his supporters knows the same thing and simply doesn't give a shit about who he offends.

[–] DaMummy@lemmy.world -4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, but like, it made him, like, sounds like a, teenage, like, schoolgirl. I would, like, take that, like, excuse if it was only, like, during important, like, speeches, and stuff. But he, like, did it during, like, the most mundane, like, things he would, like, say.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago

Interesting that you had to change to a completely different type of dialogue in order to make it sound bad.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But he, like, did it during, like, the most mundane, like, things he would, like, say.

He got criticized for wearing a tan suit. There were no times that were mundane for him.

Yeah, but like, it made him, like, sounds like a, teenage, like, schoolgirl.

Except...he never said "like" like valley girl speak ever.

The opposite is trump, so I hope you're enjoying when the current president speaks instead of Obama.

[–] DaMummy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

No, Trump is even worse, especially when you read what he's saying.