this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
1473 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

17524 readers
2712 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zarathustra0@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So I need 80 tons of it in my firebox?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Well, you'd then have another problem. Unlike coal/wood/oil fuel, you can't turn off radioactive decay.

You'd have megawatts (gigawatts?) of thermal energy boiling off all your water pretty quickly, and likely eventually melting down your steam engine firebox, and it would be that hot for decades!

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can boost it by hollowing out the middle and filling it with tritium, but plutonium is dense, so 80 tons will probably fit in the firebox just fine.

[–] zarathustra0@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

but plutonium is dense, so 80 tons will probably fit in the firebox

I feel like there's a thing that will happen when I put that much in such a comparatively small place.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It'll heat up the firebox, which is exactly what the firebox wants to happen. It's not like we're using precisely-timed explosives to briefly make the mass much more than critical and counter its desire to blow itself apart for long enough that it blows other things apart, too.