this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
479 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

78341 readers
5292 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fishos@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

This is a moronic take. Do we also tax tools when they make a 4 person job a 1/2 person job? This is just an ass backwards way of approaching the wealth inequality and poor working conditions issues by focusing on a tool instead of the system itself.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, we easily could.

I pay property tax on my business tools.

So you just extend that concept. I don’t see why not.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

ok apparently we do in fact tax tools. And I can see how AI, being on the cloud, might not normally fall under computer equipment or other things that would be taxed, thus needing it to be specifically included in tax law. Fuck me on that one.

I'll give you that.

BUT

I still stand by this being a bandaid to a much larger problem concerning capitalists exploiting the labor of many and not being required to give everyone fair pay/equity. The inequality between the workforce and the ownership class is the problem. Them using AI is just their current tool of oppression, but not their only.

We need to address the root cause and directly tax the billionaires. And remove stock backed loans or at least realize their gains and tax them whenever they do use them as collateral for a loan. Shouldnt be able to claim unrealized gains and use it for collateral at the same time.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Remember, in USA companies are people, so they bribe the government with donations just like people, also money is free speech.

If they are people, they should pay taxes, why not? I say DO IT

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I hate that so much. Being "people" they can essentially "out-compete" actual people in the political process. It's very much "anything you can do I can do better". That's why any solution has to target them directly.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And the companies can exist for centuries, acquiring all of that enormous wealth, and "donate" a tiny sliver of it to politicians and watch them fight over the scraps.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wish we treated corporate crimes as personal crimes committed by the CEO. If they want the cover of personhood, then they get everything that comes with that. See how fast they want to return to being corporations. As it is now, they get the best of both worlds as it suits them.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, that would be great. Unfortunately, our government is working for them now. This is gonna get weird

[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

AI is ruining our climate, RAM prices, HDD prices qnd more. They should pay a lil extranfor that

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

climate being ruined long before ai, and the PC hardware is just suppliers being allowed to price-gouge people.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

This is a moronic take.

It's just a capital gains tax