this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
1348 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
5554 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] obinice@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (7 children)

If it's called NASA Plus, how is it free? The "plus" means it goes a step beyond their free content and into a paid tier.

Don't get me wrong this is absolutely fantastic I adore NASA and space, but they're just be some hidden cost? Otherwise it wouldn't be a streaming service called NASA Plus, right?

[–] ChewTiger@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

I don't think everyone sat down and agreed to that being what plus means. It's like labeling food as organic, it means nothing. It's just a name. Odd thing to obsess over, you'll get nowhere trying to understand marketing people, just let it go.

What they are adding is a more condensed experience accessing NASA content and making it easier for casual viewers to access. The more people paying attention to science the better. I think this is a fantastic move from NASA

[–] Sanyanov@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looks like they refer to adding their Science wing into the streaming, too.

In this crazy capitalist world peiple started forgetting that public services can be free, like, for real :D

[–] DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

*Paid for with taxes, not free.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That goes without saying.

It's free for the end consumer and everyone knows that it is paid with taxes. So saying free is just easier.

[–] shinratdr@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

But the Libertarians always have to say it. Nevermind that anything free from a corporation is paid for though advertising, or selling your data, or folded into the item cost, or future purchases, so by this strict definition that “someone is paying for it” means literally nothing is ever free.

It has to be said EVERY TIME someone mentions that public services are offered at no charge.

[–] csolisr@communities.azkware.net 10 points 1 year ago

If I need to pay taxes anyway, at least I prefer to have the investment returned back to me in some way, and this seems like a nice way to do so.

[–] Patch@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Jokes on you, I'm not an American so it really is free for me!

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 3 points 1 year ago

Well it's free for me!

[–] flerp@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Everyone knows that... that's what they mean by free, free to use. Why do you think people don't know this? Did you just figure it out or something? Are you seriously that slow?

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

plus just means more I think, they're adding to their service so it's "plus"

just because that's usually a hook to get you to pay more doesn't mean that's now the definition of the word

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're selling our usage data to aliens to pay for server costs

[–] flerp@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

What do you expect? "We're not hosting an intergalactic kegger down here!"

[–] Strobelt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Mauve for this you'll need to have an account? This would already help nasa market products towards you and this is a good value they can get without you paying anything.