this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
-25 points (17.9% liked)
science
23428 readers
994 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think that's the core of it. But the author is a "tide goes in, tide goes out, you can't explain that" kind of moron. Of course you can explain a cell's operation through physics->chemistry->biology. We can't explain the spark of life yet, but we can certainly explain life processes.
This is, of course, nonsense. A light source isn't information, life doesn't need information, and plants grow toward light through simple chemical reactions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phototropism
Picture one of those bell curves memes where the right-side Jedi Guy is saying "everything is information".
There are interpretations of quantum mechanics amd relativity that are compatible with that.
Because there is no spark of life. It's just a poetic phrase that captures the vague feeling and emotional aura around the concept of life and living things, but it's not a literal physical thing that exists that requires an explanation.