this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
-25 points (17.9% liked)

science

23428 readers
1070 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] itkovian@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

What truth is the article talking about? The article is basically slop that goes from place to place without a thing to say.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

One of physicists’ great talents—starting with the laws of simple parts (such as atoms) and working up to a complex whole—cannot fully account for cells, animals, or people.

I think that's the core of it. But the author is a "tide goes in, tide goes out, you can't explain that" kind of moron. Of course you can explain a cell's operation through physics->chemistry->biology. We can't explain the spark of life yet, but we can certainly explain life processes.

The fundamental laws that govern matter and energy cannot predict another fundamental property of life: It is the only system in the universe that uses information for its own purposes. Plants grow toward light, microbes swim toward rich food sources, animals hide from predators, humans send giant metal contraptions into outer space.

This is, of course, nonsense. A light source isn't information, life doesn't need information, and plants grow toward light through simple chemical reactions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phototropism

[–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Picture one of those bell curves memes where the right-side Jedi Guy is saying "everything is information".

There are interpretations of quantum mechanics amd relativity that are compatible with that.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

We can’t explain the spark of life yet

Because there is no spark of life. It's just a poetic phrase that captures the vague feeling and emotional aura around the concept of life and living things, but it's not a literal physical thing that exists that requires an explanation.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe an AI written article? Or science from a christian bias? Its nonsense claiming a cell membrane defies our understanding of physics. It is 100% physical laws thus chemistry

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

The Atlantic has a lib/zionist bias so maybe that's why they're pushing pseudo-science.