this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
308 points (99.4% liked)

News

34031 readers
4099 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Alcohol and tobacco are by far the worst of any drugs ever created.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There have been many studies on this subject (none in the US, since we are under strict prohibition). They calculate both harm to user and harm to society.

Almost all these studies are in agreement that there are three classes of 'hard' drugs that are significantly worse than the rest- opioids, amphetamines, and alcohol. Many rate alcohol as slightly more destructive than the other two.

Tobacco is rated significantly less harmful, mostly because of the amount of tobacco it takes to do harm. No one dies from a single night of heavy smoking; many people die from a single night of alcohol, amphetamines, or opiates. Second-hand smoke is dangerous, but not nearly as dangerous as a drunk driver.

Personally I think these studies underrate benzodiazipines, they should be considered the fourth class of hard drugs imo.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is a great response.

When harm to society is considered, does that include such things as health care, legal/criminal, and damages to property? Death would obviously be a more weigghted category.

The single use danger makes sense.

I wonder, is length of horrific suffering and toll it takes and trauma it leaves, a factor?

(My dad was a drinker, his many medical issues attributed to drinking were not much fun to witness over the 7 months I had to stay with them til he died.

I am not ok.)

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorry to hear about your father.

I believe the study considered everything you mentioned, you can see the categories in this graph:

PDF of the study is available: Drug harms in the UK: A multi-criterion decision analysis

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Thanks for these stats. Its nice to see actual data.

It's not exactly a revelation. Seeing the drugs that were all the rave in the 90s/00's at the bottom end of the data and remembering the UK gov and police going hard against the love, all the while docs are prescribing the worst and pubs are serving the king of the worst.

Also, Imagine if alcohol were illegal.

And thanks for the sentiment.

Its been years now but I still have flashbacks and it makes me want to drink. I don't drink, seing what it did to his body. He was otherwise an upstanding and very well respected member of community and society. He just liked his beer and whiskey at the end of the day. Every day.

Though I have done every other drug on that list aside from khat. I don't anymore.

Just the best 7 or 8 of them.

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Uh there's Krokodil (actually it turns out most of what you read is the production not the literal chemical desomorphine causing most of the issues you hear about)

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Also "relatively few drugs come from Venezuela into the U.S. The synthetic opioid fentanyl causes the most fatalities in the US, but is mainly produced by Mexican cartels from Chinese raw materials."

[–] BlackVenom@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In terms of mortality it's not even close. Alcohol alone kills nearly twice as many people as all other drugs combined.

Tobacco, 5x as many.

[–] nyctre@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, but isn't that just because anyone can buy them in the supermarket? Start selling opioids in the same way and I'm pretty sure those stats would change.

Is the AK-47 the worst weapon we've created just because it's killed the most people? I don't think that's how those stats are supposed to be used, imo.

[–] ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are several countries that basically did this and no, the stats don't change. In fact, de-criminalizing those drugs has lead to a decrease in usage and associated deaths in all cases I'm aware of.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Decriminalization isn’t anywhere near the same as legalization. One means you wont go to jail when you get caught with it despite it being illegal to sell, while the other means it's legal to possess, buy, and sell.

I'm also curious about the rates of users to deaths and not just total number of deaths as most adults use alcohol at some point while only a tiny percent use stuff like meth or heroin.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Studies in the UK show that there are three classes of 'hard' drugs - alcohol, amphetamines, and opioids.

All three roughly follow the '10% rule': 10% of people who try these drugs become addicted, and 10% of addicts die from their addiction.

Meth, heroin, and alcohol each kill about 1% of the people who try them.

Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria decision analysis

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its an interesting abstract but unfortunately doesn't include the data or breakdown of methodology without having Lancet access.

Members of the Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs, including two invited specialists, met in a 1-day interactive workshop to score 20 drugs on 16 criteria: nine related to the harms that a drug produces in the individual and seven to the harms to others. Drugs were scored out of 100 points, and the criteria were weighted to indicate their relative importance.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

Here's a better link where you can download the full PDF Drug harms in the UK: A multi-criterion decision analysis