WHERE STEAM FRAME??? (Credits go to a friend)
this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
180 points (90.2% liked)
linuxmemes
28818 readers
915 users here now
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
- Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
- Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
- Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
- Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
- Bigotry will not be tolerated.
3. Post Linux-related content
- Including Unix and BSD.
- Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of
sudoin Windows. - No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
- Don't come looking for advice, this is not the right community.
4. No recent reposts
- Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
5. 🇬🇧 Language/язык/Sprache
- This is primarily an English-speaking community. 🇬🇧🇦🇺🇺🇸
- Comments written in other languages are allowed.
- The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
- Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
6. (NEW!) Regarding public figures
We all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations. - Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
- We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
- Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The Gaben worship is just PR for a monopoly.
Steam is a nice service but good god the glazing needs to stop. On Steam you do not own your games.
I don't really think steam is anti competitive, their product is just so much better than the competition that they've earned a monopoly position. Whenever another company has tried to dethrone steam, it's lacked features or didn't allow refunds or didn't run on Linux or didn't work as well with controllers - valve is just so far ahead on steam, it'd be monumentally difficult to catch up.
They are anticompetitive, just not in an obvious way that is antagonistic toward consumers.
While I'm willing to forgive requiring price parity when it's a steam key, which will ultimately be redeemed on Steam and utilize all of the services provided by Valve, this should not apply to other platforms that distribute the game themselves.
Just because they haven't used the power they have doesn't mean they should have it. A benevolent monopoly is still a monopoly, and we're essentially just betting that a billionaire's interests will always align with ours.
What's your proposed solution? Open source can't really fix this - distribution of proprietary games isn't really geared towards FOSS. If all competing products are worse, why would anyone switch? Valve isn't using any underhanded tricks to keep users on Steam, they don't need to. Their competitors actually could catch up, theoretically, valve hasn't pulled up the ladder. It's just a matter of, y'know, making a product nearly as good as Steam, which is a monumental undertaking.
The idea that they don't use tricks is not true. Valve’s "Price Parity" rules stop other stores from competing on price. For instance, if a dev tries to pass their 12% Epic savings onto the customer, Valve can kick them off Steam, where 75% of their revenue lives. That is a massive underhanded leverage.
Also, it is not just about making a better product. It is switching costs. Because our libraries and social circles are locked into a proprietary ecosystem, we aren't choosing Steam every day. We are just stuck there.
The solution is not for a competitor to build a "more perfect Steam," that is impossible because Valve has a 20 year head start on our data. The solution is mandated interoperability.
We need a system where:
We did this with cell phone numbers (you can keep your number when you switch carriers) and the EU has been doing this with messaging apps. There's no reason we should not do it for our multi-thousand-dollar game libraries.
We did this with cell phone numbers so you could switch carriers without losing your identity. They are doing it with messaging apps in Europe so you can text a WhatsApp user from a different app. There is no reason we should accept anything less for a digital library worth thousands of dollars. The goal isn't to kill Steam, it is to make Steam actually compete for our loyalty every day instead of just relying on the fact that we're too locked-in to leave.
Edit: fixed final paragraph.
First of all, yeah, price parity sucks...but also the only thing it changes is that simply being cheaper isn't an option. From my PoV all it does is it forces competition to compete on features. Which they all fail to do.
Friend, steam literally alows you to load games outside of steam. You absolutely can still rely on steam friends when playing even pirated games. Steam literally allows you to do it. And having more than one store installed, while not comfy, isn't a sin - we are choosing steam due to it's services - controller support, linux support, inbuilt forums, friend network, robust review system, robust return policy, great user support, and probably even more that I don't know about due to being more niche.
Again, bull. Let's look at competition, sans "We only sell our own games" stores.
And just to be clean - I am not against your interchangable library idea, although I am not really for it either. I just really disliked how you described steam as some monstrous entity holding people by ransom.
I appreciate the civil discussion, but I think you’re confusing "convenience" with "freedom."
You mentioned adding non-Steam games, but that's just a shortcut. You lose the "Join Game" buttons, the cloud saves, and the lobby invites. That is the definition of a social moat. You can leave, but you’re socially penalized for doing so.
As for competition, the fact that GOG and Itch.io have to hide in tiny niches just to survive proves my point. When the #1 player has 75%+ of the market, they don't have to be perfect, they just have to be too big to leave.
My solution of mandated interoperability is exactly how we fixed the phone industry. You can switch carriers and keep your number. We should be able to switch launchers and keep our friends and games. If Steam is truly as perfect as you say, they should have nothing to fear from a system where users are actually free to leave. A benevolent gatekeeper who refuses to unlock the gate is still a gatekeeper.
And it's exactly how I mentioned it. It's simply a way to use some of steam features - for free - even if you use different shop. Their controller support, friend list, library access. A limited amount of access but nonetheless, yet again, something they provide that they don't have to and other shops (except GOG I believe?) don't support.
Cloud saves should be handled by whatever alternative you choose, and both join game and lobby invites should be ideally handled by game - that's how it began, didn't it? Steam simply offered option for games to extend it to friends chat out of the game. And hell, today even Discord of all things has something like this.
I admit, bad wording on my part. But while Itch relies on niche, in GOG's case I meant their initiative of saving old games. Other than that, they are really competing as a full alternative. And...I just learned GOG does not publish it's number, huh. But they are constantly growing from what I saw published, so evidently, you can throw gauntlet at Steam and do well. And I just learned that they aren't really that far on feature parity, with library integration being something unique, huh. No wonder people on lemmy praise it xD
I just want to underline, again, that this is the first time I am facing that point and thus, have no opinion of my own yet formed, so I am not gonna say anything as it would simply be reductive. First reaction is mixed from me - number is one thing, forcing a store front to suddenly have to change contracts with game providers, clash with legal and all that to essentially allow you to carry over hundreds of products seems iffy. On the other hand, these are just copy keys at the end of the day so the only question is how easy would it be contract-wise? Dunno. And that's why I am witholding forming an opinion as of now.
At the end I wanna mention only that our talk made me look up some stuff about both GOG - which I now appreciate a lot more, they really are closing in feature-wise to steam - and phone operators. The second one especially was a weird thing to discover. I was a kid when the number carry-over came to be and, honestly, believed it was some weird marketing strategy...fun to know it was one of early EU thingies.
It is awesome that you looked into the phone number carry over history! That is exactly the kind of forced change that everyone thought would be impossible or "iffy" until it became law. Now, we can't imagine a world without it.
To your point about the difficulty: the reason it feels "iffy" is that we’ve let these stores build walled gardens. The EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) is already solving this for other tech sectors. It mandates that gatekeepers provide APIs for Real-Time Data Portability.
If Valve was designated a gatekeeper, they wouldn't have to hand out keys manually, they would just have to allow a secure, standardized way for you to prove to GOG or Epic that you own the game.
You are right that GOG is doing great work, but the reason their Library Integration is often buggy is that they are scraping data that Steam doesn't want to share. My point is that we should not have to rely on GOG's clever workarounds. We should have the legal right to our own data.
If we move from a world of stores to a world of protocols (like email or phone numbers), the best product wins because it is actually better, not because it is holding a $2,000 library hostage.
We could have real regulations if most gamers weren't busy being bootlicking fanboys. Stop defending billionaires and their money extracting machines, they actively hate you.
Basically, Valve is too big to compete with at this point, because any competing product needs to be more perfect out the gate for people to even consider using it. Which is hard to do when you are not as entrenched and don't have the kind of money Valve has.
Epic and Microsoft have way more money than Valve does.
And Google, Amazon, Apple.
Steam peaks at ~40-45 million concurrent users so far. The Switch sold over 150 million units. Of course, there's no way to know what the peak concurrent switch users were, or the total count of unique steam users from 2017-2025, but I still think these numbers are good indicators that Steam is NOT the gigantic monopoly that the vocal minority of haters think they are.
Raw wealth doesn't matter as much as market capture. Valve makes more money per employee than almost any company in history. They don't need Microsoft’s billions because they already own the toll booth for the entire PC industry. When you control the only road everyone has to drive on, you don't need to be the biggest car company.
Source: https://www.tomshardware.com/video-games/pc-gaming/valve-makes-almost-usd50-million-per-employee-raking-in-more-cash-per-person-than-google-amazon-or-microsoft-gaming-giants-350-employees-on-track-to-generate-usd17-billion-this-year
Not to mention those companies have divided priorities. Valve's main income is Steam, they have a vested interest in keeping their product dominant. Microsoft and Epic simply don't, because their stores are only side projects that incentivise their main income sources. But that's not to say I want to substitute Steam with some other corpo giant's latest money grab either.
The bigger question is why more consumer-friendly stores like GOG that sell DRM-free games can't compete with Steam. High profile games have no incentive to release DRM-free versions of their titles on GOG because the bigger store where they make more money encourages DRM. And these locked-in publisher relationships built on DRM allows Valve to outcompete more consumer-friendly stores through sales and user experience.
Valve gets a lot of clout in the Linux sphere because their adoption of open-source platforms is better than their competitors, and we have the mindset of "a rising tide lifts all ships", but this is also what we were saying about Google and Android 15 years ago and we can see how that is shaping up. Something something "you either die a hero..."
GOG can't compete because their current strategy is blue ocean compared to Valve - they sell indie and older classic games at reasonable rates with the good hook of DRM-free downloads. Other than that, they don't really have any way to really challenge Steam, and in my personal opinion that's fine. Steam does have relatively lenient DRM policies (the real problem is companies that add additional stuff like Denuvo onto their game), but obviously can't emulate GOG's policies without alienating a ton of devs, and GOG can't copy Steam's policies or the same would happen with their existing users.
(Also to clarify, Steam does not require any DRM for any game listed on the Steam Store. Check any Toby Fox game.)
GoG can’t compete because they won’t. They haven’t had a functional Linux client in what, a decade?