this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
926 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

18300 readers
1921 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

https://www.marathonfusion.com/alchemy.pdf

https://thebsdetector.substack.com/p/government-funded-alchemy

tldr from that blog's assessment:

First, the researchers have a high degree of credential credibility. [...] These are very much not software engineers who think they’ve solved alchemy after talking with ChatGPT for a year or something.

[...]

Optimistically, in my mind this leaves about 10% odds that fusion energy becomes commercialized or at least piloted over the next couple decades and Marathon Fusion’s approach for the alchemical production of gold becomes a meaningful consideration for these fusion plants! That’s pretty high, and implies a high value for continuing to research this technology, even if not necessarily for Marathon Fusion specifically. Manifold [a prediction market] traders are giving this proposition ("Artificially produced gold on a significant scale by 2035?") ~20% odds, which likely reflects the discount rate on a market that only resolves in 10 years, although it also leaves room for other potential methodologies for gold production (presumably also through fusion energy but who knows).

[...]

Oh ya, this Gold is Radioactive

[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I... don't know if I want to believe someone who cites a gambling site as a credible source.

[–] Ludrol@szmer.info 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
  1. Prediction market is a tool to predict a future more accurately than asking people what will happen[1][2]
  2. You can't cash out on manifold.markets so I would not mark it as gambling unlike polymarket. It works like premium in-game currency
[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I don't think "asking people what will happen" is a reliable way to measure pretty much anything, let alone the future, so being more accurate than that is whatever. Additionally, I tried to find where the substack got his numbers for these chances from, and it seems like the answer is out of his ass? So that isn't very credible either in my opinion.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

i'd take the citation for economics. maybe business. not physics.