this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
8 points (78.6% liked)

Fediverse

38775 readers
652 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/41384718

Previously, I made a post about Crowdbucks, but I just had a random (most likely stupid) follow-up thought.

What if the issue isn’t which currency to use — but the assumption that it needs to be “real” currency at all?


What if, instead of money, there was something like FediCoin / FediBucks / credits / points (name doesn’t matter), NOT crypto, and NOT blockchain — more like how platforms such as Wattpad operate?

Or like how carnivals and fairs work: You exchange real money at a booth, and in return you get tokens or fake currency that are only usable inside that ecosystem.


Some comparisons:

Wattpad coins

App “credits” or points

Forum reputation systems with unlocks

Arcade tokens

Fair/carnival tickets


In a Fediverse context, this could hypothetically be used for things like:

Supporting instance costs

Boosting posts or creators (opt-in), which could then potentially be exchanged for real currency (maybe, idk)

Unlocking cosmetic or convenience features

Community rewards instead of ads

Again, not crypto, not speculation, not “number go up.” More like an internal exchange or contribution system that stays inside the Fediverse.


So my questions are:

Is this fundamentally incompatible with Fediverse values, or just unexplored?

Would this be more acceptable than direct monetization or ads?

Could something like this remain optional and non-extractive?

Has anyone already experimented with something similar?


I don’t have the time, energy, or technical knowledge to build something like this — just curious whether this idea is interesting, terrible, or already solved.

Would love to hear thoughts from people more familiar with Fediverse economics and culture.


EDIT:

It gives off Japanese Pachinko vibes.

https://immigrationnewscanada.ca/the-bizarre-world-of-japanese-pachinko-gambling-without-technically-gambling/

https://www.chenlawjournal.org/pachinko/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Steve 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So if they have real cash value, how do you secure a distributed currency system without a blockchain? How do you stop the creation of fraudulent tokins?

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Such a system could be set up relatively easily with GNU Taler. The problem is rather on the legal side for the organization that holds the funds and converts it to the tokens. Unless you are registered as a bank there are severe limitations on how much money you can hold and covert.

[–] rglullis 1 points 22 hours ago

Stripe has the connected account system where they work as the money transmitter, so one could build a system where you just need to keep track of the IOUs and Stripe is the one collecting and sending payments. It's how Github sponsors work, and it's how I set up the Communick Collective

[–] Steve 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then you have a central org you need to trust with the money. It's not really distributed or federated system anymore.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There is no need for a central org. It could be many different ones all using the same Taler software. In fact given the legal limitations that's probably the only way to do it.

[–] Steve 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Couldn't each one decide how much to charge and pay for their tokens? Like a swarm of countless centralized currencies, rather than a single decentralized one?

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Taler isn's a currency but a payment system. So yes, each token generating entity (exchange) would have their own token. There could be some sort of backend settling mechanism between exchanges (I think Taler is working on that), but basically the person receiving the token would have to redeem it with the same exchange that issued it. Legally it can't be directly exchanged back to fiat money, but the exchange could issue a service contract with the person and pay them according to the tokens they hold.

[–] Teknevra@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The coins themselves don't have any monetary value.

What you do is you purchase the amount that you want, on the platform server that you are planning on using them on.

Ie Peertube.

You would then tip / etc with them.

And then, the creators, etc. that you pay, would then be able to cash out those coins for real currency.

[–] rglullis 2 points 22 hours ago

But again, why go through all this trouble instead of just sending money through a payment processor?

[–] azdle@news.idlestate.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The coins themselves don’t have any monetary value. [...] And then, the creators, etc. that you pay, would then be able to cash out those coins for real currency.

The ability to 'cash out' means they do have monetary value.

[–] Teknevra@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then I guess that the term "Trade In" might be better.

As I mentioned in the post, it's similar to how Pachinko Rules work.

[–] Steve 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Whatever the term, if the coins can be exchanged back into a real currency or goods, they have real value, and as such they're as good cash.

Wikipedia:

Pachinko balls won from games cannot be exchanged directly for money in the parlor, nor can they be removed from the premises or exchanged with other parlors. However, they can be legally traded to the parlor for so-called "special prize" tokens (tokushu keihin (特殊景品) [ja]), which can in turn be "sold" for cash to a separate vendor off-premises.

That's still not going to work without either a blockchain or central trusted management org of some kind.