this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
695 points (99.4% liked)

News

34493 readers
4245 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Minnesota resident Will Stancil is a lawyer, policy researcher, and onetime candidate for the state’s house of representatives who has long been a voluble progressive presence on X and Bluesky. Over the past week, Stancil has become a mainstay of citizen patrols, tracking ICE agents around the city in his Honda Fit and sharing his experiences with his 100,000-plus followers. On Friday, I spoke with Stancil about what he has witnessed over the past few days.

...

Do the videos we’ve seen — of violent arrests, of agents deploying flash-bangs and tear gas on bystanders — capture the full extent of what’s happening?

No. In the private rapid-response channels, people will share many, many videos, and they don’t want to bring them public because they don’t want to be identified. People are worried. So there’s lots and lots more private stuff that is never circulating. The other thing is I think it’s really difficult to capture. The last few days have been calmer. But for the first week or so, it was really hard to convey the unrelenting pace of this stuff. I had a journalist come ride along — he just published an article about it. I had been talking about how crazy it was, and I could tell he was a little bit skeptical. He thought, Okay, maybe we’ll see an ICE car. In a two-hour ride, we chased four ICE convoys onto the highway, saw someone violently abducted alive in front of us, then saw a separate ICE convoy tear-gas a major commercial intersection for no reason at all. In two hours.

We have these rapid-response channels. I mean, I got to the point where — and this is very difficult to do — but I got to the point where I mute them or turn them off or leave them when I come home in the evening because getting the constant updates — as much as I want to be informed of my community, if I’m not out there and can’t do anything about it, I am a raw nerve all day and night. I come home and I just have to lie on the couch and just shut everything off and shut my brain off because you’ll go insane hearing about what all they’re doing.

Archived at https://archive.ph/fiwGH

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 79 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It will officially be once Waltz orders the state national guard to defend the city from ICE. Which is why he doesn't.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He's walking a knife edge right now. MAGA is looking for an excuse to go fucking crazy violent and suspend elections, and Walz doesn't want to give it to them.

We'll see what happens AFTER the Midterms. Whatever the outcome, MAGA will use it as an excuse to crank up their violence, and I doubt governors and mayors will continue to be as accommodating.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They're going to cancel midterms anyways. And if they don't and we win a few seats, they're not going to recognize it. Why let this drag on when it's actively causing harm to millions every single day?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

NO, they will not cancel Midterms. We've never cancelled an election in American history, not even during the Civil War or WW2. That is a BRIGHT RED LINE that they will NOT be permitted to cross for ANY reason. Non negotiable.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Respectfully, who is going to enforce that they happen? It certainly won't be the government

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

The Black Panthers?

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 37 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He is not going to do that. I like Walz but that isn't going to happen.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Minnesotans are modest but hard as nails. Don't bet against it.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

What would be the point? Trump can just instantly federalize them and then use them against you.

Anyone who thinks we're getting out of this through some kind of military action is delusional. We don't have the resources to stand up to the military and the massive police state in this country, that's just a fact. That's not even include all the wingnut traitor militias out there.

If we ever get back in power then we need to strip the presidency of most of its powers (after we destroy maga and their billionaires and media apparatus via the DOJ) and return control of the NG back to the states.

The president shouldn't be able to seize those units unilaterally without permission from the state governor/legislature. That defeats the entire point of having state militias.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

WHY would we DO such a Thing as PUNISH MAGA when we Need HEALING and PEACE!

-Democrats who said They had Enough Information to Jail Trump during Biden's Term but chose Not to!

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago

Kronstadt is the point.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

When do we, though? ~~When~~ Once it's clearly over already? Then, we can "bet against it"? When it doesn't fucking matter anymore?

Tough as nails that are currently getting hammered into silence, more like. 🤌🏼

(edited for clarity)

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 42 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Minnesotans are out in the street daily. It is the democratic leadership I have no faith in.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

Fair enough. 🥲

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

i don't know what news you're watching but minnesota is literally resisting harder than any other state short of maybe California

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

In what way is California resisting ICE harder than Minnesotans?

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Already passed laws against masked and anonymous ICE, alongside a governor that at least speaks with a spine. Far as I can tell, most states don't have enough establishment leadership that opposes ICE.

Still not enough IMO.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

alongside a governor that at least speaks with a spine.

You're kidding right? The guy who rolls over like a dog for Ben Shapiro and mourns Charlie Kirk speaks with a bigger spine than Tim Walz?

Nah, Gavin Hug-a-Nazi Newsom ain't got shit on Tim Walz. Not that Walz has been vocal or proactive enough IMO.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

Both are crappy. Unfortunately, the more assertive one seems better suited to what the moment calls for. I am hoping that AOC becomes our next president, and Newsom fades away, Back to the Future style.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world -5 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I'm not answering your question because I literally never even said that

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Literally speaking, you literally did say those literal words, literally.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

I mean, you did.

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I've read it three times now, and I can't reach any other conclusion. Is it the "maybe" part, which can be construed as a no?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Maybe not when their political career is on the line.

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's what I don't get. There will be no politics when this is over if we don't fight. What career are people trying to save.

The same one corporate boardrooms do. The ones that can’t look past the next quarterly report, the one that sacrifices the middle class and the biosphere for safe profits. The same one that shortsightedly sacrifices the future for the status quo, the status quo that requires no loss other than the creeping one you can ignore.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The state national guard can become federalized in a moment if Trump says so. Don't count on them being any help unless they're willing to disobey orders.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I've been advocating for months now that blue states need to get their state guard going.

It's like the national guard, but entirely run by the state. It cannot be federalized. The downside is that they often share membership with the national guard and often get their training through the national guard and federal military branches.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You think the feds will just let states beef up state guards now? It's too late for that. And it would take years for anything meaningful to happen.

Americans were happy to give the president all kinds of insane powers over the last 80 years, and now we're dealing with the consequences. Some of the worst shit Trump is doing is actually legal (def not all of course), thanks to braindead chauvinistic Americans in this country, who've always loved empowering strongman figures and law enforcement.

9/11 exposed how ugly and hypocritical the true American "spirit" is. That's when many of these powers were born, especially the stupid ICE and border bullshit.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What you need to do is to organize among the working class and create a militia.

You are always looking for someone to solve your problems for you. Nobody is going to solve this one except the working class.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Not realistic either. They're already treating leftist NGOs like terrorist organizations, and private militias are technically illegal but those laws are conveniently not enforced against the far right (people have already tried to create leftist militias), so any attempt to do this would have to be fully underground. And you are up against the world's most advanced military and police state, so good luck with that.

We've dug ourselves a real hole in the US, none of this stuff happened overnight. I don't see a way out of this other than sustained political and civil resistance as seen in Hungary, who haven't succeeded yet even after 20 years.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, there have been a few instances of that happening. Notably, it happened when the governor of Arkansas tried to use the national guard to bar black students from entering a (recently desegregated) white school in 1957. Eisenhower federalized the guard, and ordered them to protect the black students instead. And the governor was forced to watch as all of “his” troops (who were already on the ground and ready to work because the governor had called them in) about-faced and started following the POTUS’ orders instead of his. It backfired on the governor pretty spectacularly, because they wouldn’t have been in place to enforce the desegregation unless he had ordered them to be there in the first place.

And Walz isn’t dumb. He undoubtedly knows that story. He doesn’t want a repeat of that, where he calls in the guard, then has them turned against him.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Eisenhower, the last non-evil Republican president.

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Eisenhower orchestrated the 1953 Iranian coup, overthrowing a democratically elected government, and installed an authoritarian, US-backed puppet. He also overthrew the democratically elected government of Guatemala at the behest of a banana company (United Fruit, now Chiquita).

Every new Republican advances the evil, because it's never punished.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Every US President does shit like that. At some point you have to draw a line because it's not helpful to just proclaim them all evil.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Unhelpful. There are degrees of evil.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The US has never had a non-evil president from any party.

I just had a horrific thought that old tricky Dick Nixon may actually end up inheriting that title just because of how bad everyone after him has been. Like compared to Trump the war on Drugs ain't fuck all, and compared to Bush jr Vietnam was practically a peace operation.