Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

143 readers

1 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@soccer.forum

rglullis

[Dale Johnson] Panel says Newcastle goal vs. Arsenal correct (www.espn.com)

submitted 1 year ago by SamuraiiChampluu@alien.top to c/main@soccer.forum

323 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] aure__entuluva@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone else pointed this out, but the 2/5 were saying they wouldn't have gotten VAR involved, meaning they thought it wasn't a clear and obvious error, not that they didn't think it was red card.

The whole "clear and obvious" thing is a huge issue. Ironically, it will never have a clear definition.

[–] chrismikehunt@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, but if they thought it was a red, and the ref didn’t give a red, that’s a clear and obvious error by proxy. If they didn’t think it was a clear and obvious error they cannot have thought he should have been sent off

[–] Khaglist@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

It’s just a completely pointless caveat that adds more confusion into the whole process.