this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
99 points (90.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

40326 readers
942 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think it was a bit of a sleight of hand to make it about time. Because time is quantifiable. You can give 5 minutes of your time but I figure most people can attest that has little to do with how much actual attention you're giving. And it's attention that we crave. That's what social media is built upon. When you really love and enjoy something or someone, you're thinking of it, even if you're not actively engaged with it. And on the other hand, if you give something attention for long enough, you do start to develop some kind of an attachment on it ( which easily becomes unhealthy too, like doom scrolling ).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wakko@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Attention is a function of dopamine & serotonin production over time.

Almost everything about being human reduces down to a handful of neurotransmitters.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Those neurotransmitters just release electrical impulses so if you want to break it down everything about humans reduces down to electricity traveling through out meat

[–] wakko@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, but the key detail is governance. There's specific molecules that, without them, there is no attention to be sought. Paying attention or "having willpower" is causally linked to these specific compounds being present in the meat.

Much of "free will" boils down to regulation of these neurotransmitters.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If your goal is to boil it down to the fundamental levels it’s the ion that’s that cause action potentials that are actually causing thought

If you want to look at it holistically it’s due to the connections of the dendrites and how those interact with each other

We have no control of our neurotransmitters and they are only released in response to stimuli from another cell

[–] wakko@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Thank you for announcing that you do not understand what was said.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Neurotransmitters are chemicals used for communication, but i uderstand what you mean.

[–] noretus@crazypeople.online 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And what are neurotransmitters?

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you typed this into your address bar youd have an answer instead of a downvote. lol

Neurotransmitters are chemicals used by terminal buttons to carry information across the synaptic gap to the dendrite of the recipient neuron.

[–] noretus@crazypeople.online 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And what are those? There's actually a few reasons I'm asking and not just looking it up online.

One of the reasons is that a 5 second search on neurobiology does not give me actual understanding. It just gives me a free-floating data point. And I wouldn't offer that data point to others because it's not coming from a place of real understanding.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're reading words on a screen either way.

Who do you think is a better source:

  1. An unverified, inaccurate, low effort, and low quality idiot 😁
  2. or Britannica?

Unless you mean something else that I'm not receiving.

[–] noretus@crazypeople.online 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I appreciate that you seem to think that my brain is any better than that an low-effort and low quality idiot but it's not.

The neurotransmitter person gave a quite confident account about the nature of attention and nature of human psychology. They clearly felt it was relevant to the point I was making. Surely someone like this has an university level degree in the subject and isn't just a random computer nerd who occasionally consumes some pop-science content online. It makes more sense to me to dip into their reservoir of knowledge instead of making a feeble attempt at reading some AI Summary on the topic.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

I was referring to myself as the alternative. But yes, maybe they'll explain it well.
I'll yield to them.