this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
99 points (90.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

40326 readers
894 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think it was a bit of a sleight of hand to make it about time. Because time is quantifiable. You can give 5 minutes of your time but I figure most people can attest that has little to do with how much actual attention you're giving. And it's attention that we crave. That's what social media is built upon. When you really love and enjoy something or someone, you're thinking of it, even if you're not actively engaged with it. And on the other hand, if you give something attention for long enough, you do start to develop some kind of an attachment on it ( which easily becomes unhealthy too, like doom scrolling ).

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Children are little attention vampires, no matter how much do you give, they will always want more.

That said, fucking phones always in our hands are a disrespect to them, so while I don't give a lot of attention, mine is 100% pure*.

*Terms and agreements might apply.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorry to be a former little vampire (now a grown vampire), but I crave my parents' affection and approval so fucking much.

I'd literally have a panic attack if I had to go out on the world on my own...

Idk why my brain is this fucked up, but I have this weird separation anxiety and trauma bond with parents, especially my mom.

Even as they are emotionally abusive with me at the same time.

I remember every time my older brother fights me, I just want to run to mom, and I did. I literally ran away from home when I was 6 because I felt so scare at home, I just went to my mom's workplace to look for her.

That incident scarred me for life.

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

I've been seeing a therapist to help deal with my massive amounts of anxiety and I believe a good amount of it is separation anxiety (along with fears of letting people down and low self esteem). I'm 30 and have never moved away from my parents. Mostly it was cause I couldn't afford to since I worked a minimum wage job, but now I probably could afford a cheap apartment close to work if my mind didn't run haywire at the thought of not being around my parents and helping them daily. My mother passed away a couple weeks ago and so much work I've put into managing my anxiety feels like it has come undone cause I no longer have the main person in my life that felt they really understood me and was constantly pushing me to better myself.

[–] wakko@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Attention is a function of dopamine & serotonin production over time.

Almost everything about being human reduces down to a handful of neurotransmitters.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Those neurotransmitters just release electrical impulses so if you want to break it down everything about humans reduces down to electricity traveling through out meat

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Neurotransmitters are chemicals used for communication, but i uderstand what you mean.

[–] wakko@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, but the key detail is governance. There's specific molecules that, without them, there is no attention to be sought. Paying attention or "having willpower" is causally linked to these specific compounds being present in the meat.

Much of "free will" boils down to regulation of these neurotransmitters.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If your goal is to boil it down to the fundamental levels it’s the ion that’s that cause action potentials that are actually causing thought

If you want to look at it holistically it’s due to the connections of the dendrites and how those interact with each other

We have no control of our neurotransmitters and they are only released in response to stimuli from another cell

[–] wakko@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Thank you for announcing that you do not understand what was said.

[–] noretus@crazypeople.online 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And what are neurotransmitters?

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you typed this into your address bar youd have an answer instead of a downvote. lol

Neurotransmitters are chemicals used by terminal buttons to carry information across the synaptic gap to the dendrite of the recipient neuron.

[–] noretus@crazypeople.online 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And what are those? There's actually a few reasons I'm asking and not just looking it up online.

One of the reasons is that a 5 second search on neurobiology does not give me actual understanding. It just gives me a free-floating data point. And I wouldn't offer that data point to others because it's not coming from a place of real understanding.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're reading words on a screen either way.

Who do you think is a better source:

  1. An unverified, inaccurate, low effort, and low quality idiot 😁
  2. or Britannica?

Unless you mean something else that I'm not receiving.

[–] noretus@crazypeople.online 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I appreciate that you seem to think that my brain is any better than that an low-effort and low quality idiot but it's not.

The neurotransmitter person gave a quite confident account about the nature of attention and nature of human psychology. They clearly felt it was relevant to the point I was making. Surely someone like this has an university level degree in the subject and isn't just a random computer nerd who occasionally consumes some pop-science content online. It makes more sense to me to dip into their reservoir of knowledge instead of making a feeble attempt at reading some AI Summary on the topic.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

I was referring to myself as the alternative. But yes, maybe they'll explain it well.
I'll yield to them.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Attention isn’t always good, being followed around by a person who can’t pick up social cues who wants to give you all of their attention doesn’t feel good

A girl who wants to hang out with her friends being given unwanted attention by men doesn’t feel good

If I am driving down the road and a cop decides to give me his attention which in the process of, takes away my time and money I am surely going to be upset

Time matters because it’s a limited resource, someone giving you their time means that they have decided to give some of that limited resources to you. It doesn’t always need to be in the form of attention, if I hire a maid and they save me 2 hours of time I don’t need them to sit there and give me attention

[–] noretus@crazypeople.online 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Attention isn’t always good, being followed around by a person who can’t pick up social cues who wants to give you all of their attention doesn’t feel good

Actually this is kinda what I was thinking when I wrote the last bit. I was specifically thinking about ASMR and how ASMRtists are at risk for unhealthy attention and attachments from people who look at them for hours and hours. However it's a bit besides my point. Your attention remains valuable to you (one hopes) but obviously unwanted attention is... well, unwanted. There's a big tangent of course on if someone giving unwanted attention to someone else is really giving their attention to that person, or are they giving their attention to their personal, subjective idea about that person (I'd argue the latter, because I prefer to give attention as a concept a somewhat virtuous vibe - because I want to encourage people to value their attention).

Time matters because it’s a limited resource

So is attention. We can multitask to some degree but sooner or later the plates will start falling. But as I said, you can put a number on time but you can't give 3.5 attentions to something. For the human mind it's easier to grasp the idea of "giving time" because you can measure, compare and contrast it*. Attention just is, and it's extremely subjective specifically because in daily life it's very hard to know if someone is objectively giving their full attention to something or are they just physically present while engaging with something entirely different in their mind.

Edit: Important of course to note that we can only measure time because we developed a system for it. "10 minutes" doesn't exist in reality. There's just things that we observed to behave in certain, predictable ways and we built systems to represent the behavior, like the idea of the 24h clock.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] noretus@crazypeople.online -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Does it? I put all my attention on your post and could do so instantly. Sustaining attention of course takes as long a time as it does.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Really? You read my comment and then wrote a reply instantaneously?

[–] noretus@crazypeople.online -1 points 1 week ago

Not what I said. I moved my attention to your post instantly. Then I sustained attention to reply.

[–] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 3 points 1 week ago

I never say time is money.

I always say time is the only non-renewable resource.

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Time is happiness. You can win a lottery and become a millionaire overnight. You cannot buy more time on this earth even with all the money in the world.

Attention is what helps achieve happiness with your time.

Time I have, energy... no.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The world is illiterate 🥲

To give someone time is to give them your attention

[–] noretus@crazypeople.online 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, I don't think so. You can be physically present somewhere while your attention is in whatever is going on in your head. Though I grant you that in that case you're not doing either very well.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Then you aren’t giving them your time

Get it?

[–] dvoraqs@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Seat time" is literally what you are giving them in that situation. You can say that it's not "time" but I can say that it is because there is nuance and we are doing many things at same time. Being present physically, mentally, paying attention to your surroundings, putting in effort, etc, can in many ways be counted separately. Who's to say if your way of accounting for time is the "correct" one or whether somebody else's is?

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago

Sure but then you are the one specifically saying it’s “seat” time which is an overt signal it’s not “real” time

If you just said an unqualified time it’s rightfully assumed to be your legitimate attention

[–] noretus@crazypeople.online 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eh, I see what you mean but I think in this culture and point in time, it's useful for human well-being to see them as separate things. Like I said, conflating them is a sleight of hand. Because the reality is that you can book 1h for a meeting and then be totally mentally absent from it. People think that you're committed in the meeting, you're giving it your time as can be measured. You are not actually giving your time to the meeting but due to being physically present, you're also not using your time (and attention) freely on what you really want to. So you're doing a sleight of hand possibly on yourself and people observing you in the meeting.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The sleight of hand is being committed by you and your work-culture problem

Tbh this sounds like a kinda personal issue you have with work and working too much or having a shitty job or something and it’s somehow morphing into a linguistic dispute instead when it shouldn’t be

[–] dvoraqs@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you a boss at work of some kind? Maybe your perspective is tied up with some problem you have with your work culture. People are just complicating things when this is actually just so simple, right?

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

I’m actually your boss and very disappointed

[–] noretus@crazypeople.online 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wrote very broadly (on purpose). Never defined the nature of the meeting. What your mind says about me has little to do with my life.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You’re the one who wrote a paragraph about how work meetings suck lol

[–] noretus@crazypeople.online 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You wrote an entire paragraph literally describing work meetings being a waste of time and somehow don’t even realize it?

I think i now understand why the phrase was so confusing to you

[–] noretus@crazypeople.online 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Quite frankly it's somewhat disturbing that you take a fairly neutral description of an unspecified event as "writing an entire paragraph about how work meetings suck". You are overlaying a hell of a thought framework of your own onto the text I wrote and then telling me I'm the one with a problem. Ironic really, since you started off saying the world is illiterate.

[–] bsit@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Lots of psychoanalysis in this thread.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] bsit@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

No, but it seems unusually aggressive for very little reason.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then why are they still paying me for it?

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

They don’t have the ai technology implanted into your brain yet to only clock moments actually spent working

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

And it’s attention that we crave

You.

You crave attention, lots of people don't

You shouldn't assume everyone else thinks like you and is built like you, it's never true and a sign of low empathy.

Fix that and you'll get more attention and won't crave it so much.

[–] Deebster@infosec.pub 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The attention economy is definitely a thing that corporations are very interested in, I think you've missed the overall point of OP's post in your righteous zeal.

[–] BobbleBubble@retrolemmy.com 7 points 1 week ago

funny how you make a pretty inflammatory post that's totally uncalled for and say op lacks empathy. and also imply you don't want attention.

[–] Anuttara@leminal.space 3 points 1 week ago

lol this reads exactly like some kid saying "LOOK HOW I DON'T CARE, LOOK HOW LITTLE I CARE, LOOK AT ME FOR NOT CARING AT ALL, I'M TOTALLY BEYOND CARING" xDDD

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

u/givesomefucks does not give a fuck at all

🤔