this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
946 points (97.2% liked)

RetroGaming

26890 readers
216 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam, AI slop, or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 212 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (10 children)

I hate to break it to you but... It's been over 20 years. It's more retro now than the SNES was when the 360 came out.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 132 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 71 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

This episode is 30 years old.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Shit, that saying is over 20 years old.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

YOLO is now old enough to legally drive a car.

[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I first heard that one over 15 years ago.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You know that 'Cleopatra is temporally further away from the Great Pyramid' thing?

Grand Theft Auto V's release date is closer to Half Life 2's release date, than to the present.

Grand Theft Auto 4's release date is closer to the release date of the original Starfox or Street Fighter 2, than it is to the present.

And you don't even want me to do any date comparison for the following:

... Let's do the time warp Againnn!~

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

For everything there is a season and a time for every purpose under heaven.

Spock - Civilization 4 (2005)

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

It's never too late to find a time warp to go back a few decades. The holos just don't hit the same

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 39 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Wow the diminishing returns between that time really comes into focus.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

I mean yeah. There isn't that much of a drastic shift in game design, except for the bleeding of RPG mechanics into more genres, more roguelite mechanics in indie games (choose one of 3) and having equipment systems in multiplayer FPSes. The biggest hit of 2024 was basically solitaire.

It's hardly that much more different.

Wheras, going from snes through ps1 to xbox 360, things went from 2d (and extremely crude 3d) to textured 3d with jank controls to high fidelity games with standardised controls. Not much changed after that. The huge "innovations" of VR, motion controls, are basically niche due to economic factors, so people aren't exactly having commonplace motion control VR experiences that put them in the game and comparing that to ducking behind cover in gears of war. They're comparing making cover in Fortnite with ducking behind cover in gears of war.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The line between 4th and 5th gen (SNES to N64) was enormous, 5th to 6th was pretty significant, 6th to 7th was noticeable, and it's been 20 years of small improvements since then.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

There is a noticeable difference in graphics from 7th to 9th. But 8th felt like a half step. And it doesn't feel like there are noticeable improvements in any graphics, physics engines, lighting or anything else since 2020 when 9th gen started. This cant be said about any generations up to 8th.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Right. I bet more people play SNES than Xbox now as well.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

SNES is far more accessible due to ease of emulation and small game sizes, so makes sense!

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

I guess if you count emulators and Brazil....

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Me then: "Haha 'time marches on' what a cool phrase"

Me now: "Yo, time, can we maybe slow the pace or take the break?" Time: "No. Only march on." Me: visibly aging

[–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 8 points 3 days ago

I already have Father Time beating my ass before I even started playing Hades II lmao

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Frankly, the reason this is shocking to people is that games, graphically and mechanically, made leaps and bounds from the SNES to the 360, and gave largely stagnanted from the 360 to now.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A LOT of people have completely failed to grasp how much technology has stagnated in the last 20 years.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Yeah, my smart phone with Internet access basically everywhere begs to differ.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Phones didn't changed fundamentally since 2015.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Saying technology hasn't progressed in 10 years is a very different statement than technology hasn't progressed in 20 years.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Phones, as we know them today, entered market much later than consoles or PCs.

My point is that eventually we hit the ceiling of progress. PCs and consoles hit their peak 20 years ago while phones did 10 years ago. Things haven't changed in a while for both of them and it doesn't feel so far that there will be major progress any time soon.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

We've got driverless cars and CRISPR gene editing. Those weren't around 20 years ago. You don't think those are major advancements?

[–] RalfWausE@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The Iphone entered the marked in 2007, before that is what entirely possible to connect a PDA to the internet via you dumbphone (using IRC from my palm pilot in the 90s surely felt cool...)

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] datavoid@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

I don't understand, is that from now?

[–] faultyproboscus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You're a generation off: It's more retro now than the NES (US release) was when the 360 came out. We crossed that threshold about a month ago.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Yeah, but the SNES became retro the moment the PS1 came out. That leap in tech was ridiculous.

[–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago

*crumbles into pieces like a Dry Bones*

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Perhaps I'm in a minority but when the PS3 and 360 first debuted I did not consider even the NES to be "retro". I would have applied that term to the likes of an Atari 2600 or colecovision.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The NES and Atari are separated by mere 6 years. The NES and Xbox 360 are separated by nearly 22 years. That's how much the perception of graphical advancement has decelerated. Sure we keep making leaps on graphical fidelity, but ever more in areas that are less and less noticeable every time.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago

I don't believe you.

You didn't hate that at all.