this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
781 points (98.3% liked)

politics

28118 readers
2160 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemonySplit@lemmy.ca 43 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I'm amazed more people aren't standing their ground (opening fire) when masked goons jump out of an unmarked car and try to kidnap someone. So much for all that second amendment peacocking eh

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 34 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Because they're not out in force in places where a high percentage of people carry.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

When they raided Chicago ICE specifically stayed away from the really bad parts because they didn’t wanna get shot.

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. This is also why they have targeted schools, daycares, and other spaces they know they’re less likely to encounter strong resistance.

Also exactly why they don’t go to red states with lax gun laws, among other reasons.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I live in Tucson, where there are a ton of Mexicans, and I've been wondering why it hasn't been as bad here. And yes, Arizona does have really lax gun laws.

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

Time will tell, and they (admin and gestapo) will get desperate - please do what you can to prepare for the worst with the understanding that it could and likely will be much worse.

I really wish I am overreacting and sounding unnecessary alarm, however fresh horror reaches us everyday and proves we’re not worried or prepared enough.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

This is the correct answer. They're hitting blue cities where it's mainly left leaning people who are anti-gun. Why hit a 2a strong hold if you're probably going to meet force. They'll kill for the paycheck, but they don't want to die for it.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 days ago

Plus most people have no combat training. I can handle aggressive drivers no problem. If masked thugs rush me with drawn weapons, I will very effectively shit myself at best, run hard at worst

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 13 points 4 days ago (5 children)

People just don't want to be involved, and I'm not going to judge them for that.

As in, I have a wife and 2 young kids. My purpose in life is to care for and support them. If I'm at work or whatever and some goons show up to abduct someone I don't know, I'm not going to start blasting and go down in a blaze of glory because of an ideological position.

[–] Aussieiuszko@aussie.zone 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If you or your wife/kids were being abducted and sent to the camps, would you be happy knowing everyone else stood by not wanting to get involved?

I get being scared, but inaction is destroying countless families. If everyone stands together, the risk factor goes down.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The comment i replied to is advocating shooting at ICE goons.

Have you shot any of them recently?

Put your dick away mate.

[–] lemonySplit@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Actually I wasn't advocating for shit. I was merely observing that this is the literal scenario you guys stated you needed your emotional support weapons for, and how I'm surprised no one is using them.

Makes sense that they're targeting less gun-prone areas, but still, there's gotta be some percentage of carry-ers outside of NY no?

I agree with (Edit:~~the commenter~~)Aussie though; I'll post the full quote here so maybe even one more person sees it and internalizes it. Link to the Holocaust Encyclopedia

 First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

—Martin Niemöller
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 4 points 4 days ago

Sure ok, but my explanation as to why people aren't shooting at ICE agents remains the same.

The "they came for" quote is emotive, but a great many people are indeed "speaking out", and taking action in non-violent ways.

Quite obviously, people aren't shooting at ICE because they don't want to get shot.

The truth is there would be more incidents of people fighting back if all the people here actually stood by what they say.

Notice how there isn't. Talk is cheap and this place proves it.

The truth is- youre exactly right. People don't stupidly sacrifice themselves knowing there is no popular pushback. And at this moment there is not that popular notion that things need to be overturned.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I have a very small family, including people who are in very vulnerable groups that MAGA hates. Right now, I have to mind my manners, because they rely on me. But if ANYTHING were to happen to those people, I would have nothing left to lose, and I would become very dangerous indeed.

And I'm not going down in a blaze of glory either. Revenge is a dish best served cold, and I would be far more calculated and surgical.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’m not going to start blasting and go down in a blaze of glory because of an ideological position.

And if you don't resist, they'll kill you anyway. Now what?

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 6 points 4 days ago

Not necessarily. There's loads of ways to resist without getting myself shot.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 days ago

An ideological position like democracy, freedom and liberty? This is why the US is where it is. Those things don't come from nothing. They come from people willing to fight for them.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The second amendment people are absolutely on the side of Trump. They are more likely to shoot people who try to stop ICE than anything else.

We have more guns in the US than every single US citizen and we have lost more lives to gun violence than every war we have ever fought combined.

Guns don't solve our problems. It truly takes an idiot to believe they do.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 0 points 4 days ago

Anyone talking about action against ICE agents has lost the plot. ICE is the symptom, not the disease. You don't treat tuberculosis by targeting the coughing with Robitussin. You treat tuberculosis by targeting the bacteria with antibiotics. Address the cause of the problem, not the effect.

The person you need to be registering your complaint with is your local oligarch. Any action you want to take toward ICE, redirect it to the richest person within driving distance.