this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
218 points (98.7% liked)

3DPrinting

21789 readers
374 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/opensource/p/1823177/3d-printer-reviewers-being-honest-in-this-industry-will-put-you-out-of-a-job

This is the emails between the YouTuber YGK3D and Anycubic, it seems like they won't send 3D printers to reviewers who mention their GPL3 license violations. > > tl;dr Anycubic uses open-source software for their firmware, but doesn't make it public as per license agreement, and they don't seem to be friendly to anyone who calls this out. > > More info: https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxIMpZTkXqFo0H6pDwhZpdYqMYvLhPvWA5?lc=UgxA-4LYvwrnonXuXsZ4AaABAg >

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 87 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The most trustworthy reviews are always those where the reviewers just bought the products. Even when it's not as blatant as it is here, there's always a motivation to not anger the company too much when you get their products early and for free.

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The most trustworthy reviews are always those where the reviewers just bought the products.

So much this. One reason why there are so super few honest Bambu Lab reviews out there, they understood how to do PR through influencers and used their VC money to send thousands of devices everywhere for basically free (and keep doing so) to build an overly positive lifestyle image. Those few who do actual deep dives and get cut off from new free devices simply drown in the masses. Meanwhile their printers melt themselves and the A1 Mini apparently likes to catch fire.

Anycubic is a whole different beast, they've known to basically steal stuff for many years (like when they took Prusa's first-gen MMU design and successfully patented a slightly different design). Shit like this is one of the reasons Prusa is meddling with new licenses in the first place.

Creality now went IPO and is blasting every corner of their products with AI. Elegoo also already broke licenses to close off their devices.

Pretty sure vendors like Snapmaker, Sovol or QIDI also have done a sufficient amount of shit.

Capitalism will always be a shitshow like this, and it's annoying. Ethical or even lawful behaviour shouldn't be something you have to be able to afford, it should be the fucking default because it's made free and beneficial to everyone.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who isn't shitty and affordable at the same time in the 3D printing space?

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 7 points 22 hours ago
[–] bort@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

vendors like Snapmaker

so far Snapmaker seems to have a good trackrecord, and has earned the trust of many, as their successful u1 kickstarter showed.

they promised to opensource large parts of their by end of next month. Lets see how that turns out https://support.snapmaker.com/hc/en-us/articles/33344279396759-Snapmaker-U1-FAQ#h_01K4VWF124M7HRBZEB4SS4EM09

What firmware does the Snapmaker U1 use, and is it open source?

The Snapmaker U1 runs on Klipper firmware, with Moonraker for API management. Both have been modified by Snapmaker and are scheduled to be released as open source before March 2026...

From the provided link, running out of days to keep that promise.