this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
802 points (94.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38367 readers
3962 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I agree, and feel similarly about the inclusion of operation Northwoods.
It's most prominently a horrifying plan that was rejected and remained classified, with the proposer being replaced shortly afterwards (it's entirely possible that's a coincidence).

Someone thinking of something horrible and then not doing it isn't evidence that they would do something similar. There's no particular reason to think they hid evidence because they admitted in the same deeply classified documents to doing far worse things.

[–] abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know, and you don't need to point to Operation Northwoods to "prove" anything because American Government officials have proposed much worse things and have done much worse things.

Like MacArthur proposed using nukes like conventional bombs to completely irradiate the Korean - Chinese Border. This would not merely kill Millions, perhaps billions, but it would cause a nuclear winter. For that, MacArthur was dismissed. That was a proposal.

What people forget is that MacArthur fired upon American World War One vets protesting to get their War bonuses because of the depression during the Bonus War. You don't need to make up conspiracies, what governments have already done/doing are bad enough.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For MacArthur, that plan, while horrific, wasn't as bad as you're painting it, if only because the bombs would have been much lower yield than modern nukes.

It would kill millions, especially if he used ground burst instead of air burst, but the actual global effect would be negligible. Cancer rates would spike in Northern Japan, but the fallout would mostly be over water.

Air burst would have even less effect, because there would be no fallout. (fallout is stuff from the ground that gets mixed with the radioactive material and free neutrons in a ground burst nuclear explosion, it's heavy so it falls out)

Still an insane plan and MacArthur was justly fired for it and a bunch of other similar insanity, I just wish the Dulles brothers had been similarly fired for the shit they pulled.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, great, no fallout, fuck that is great super lets detonate millions and the radiatorn will go in the ocean yay it's not so bad yay

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

You do know that uranium oxide is water soluble right? The ocean has more radioactive material in it than the land does, also water is very good at blocking radiation. That's why it's used for spent fuel cooling pools.

So the physics says that if you're going to have fallout, the ocean is the best place for it. Provided that the fallout doesn't float. Then it will most likely end up washing up on the shores of Japan.

The key here is that the bombs available in 1950 were orders of magnitude weaker than modern nukes.

Castle Brovo alone was stronger than every bomb from the MacArthur plan combined.

Using hundreds of Castle Brovo sized bombs would fuck up the world, using the bombs MacArthur had access to? Not as much.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's most prominently a horrifying plan that was rejected and remained classified

Many more horrifying plans have been accepted and are unclassified (e.g.Manhattan project).

The point is that precedent exists for hijacking planes for false flag purposes.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

There's no precedent at all. Precedent implies that it happened, which it didn't.
Something being thought of and dismissed is just not evidence for that thing being done.

It's not like it was even that original of an idea. There had been two plane hijackings by cubans in the past year. Proposing "what if a third went wrong" is hardly a masterclasses in outside the box thinking.

We've done other false flag operations. Other terrible things to domestic civilians.
Using that time we didn't actually do anything as an example is just odd.

Personally, I think people like it just because it has a cooler name. "Mongoose" just doesn't have the same ring.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Precedent implies that it happened, which it didn't.

It did. A plan was formed to the level it could be presented to the president. That happened.

It's not like it was even that original of an idea.

The original part is hijacking your own plane to blame it on another nation as a false flag operation.

We've done other false flag operations.

OK. So now you admit that there is a precedent for attacking our own people. I think we can close the discussion.

Personally, I think people like it just because it has a cooler name.

MK-Ultra is the coolest conspiracy name. Operation Paperclip is the most boring sounding.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're forgetting that the singular person responsible for the decision not to do it was assassinated shortly after...

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And? What happened next? Did they do an operation Northwoods? Did we go to war with Cuba? Was Johnson more aggressive on Cuba than Kennedy, or was he actually more engaged on diplomatic fronts?

I'm not forgetting anything. It just doesn't fit with any narrative that makes a lick of goddamned sense. Like, Kennedy rejected Northwoods because he was worried the troops might be needed in Europe, so starting a war in Cuba would be a bad move.
He was strongly in favor of every other operation they proposed as part of the larger plan.

Why would a massive conspiracy exist to kill Kennedy for rejecting a plan and then... Not do the plan?

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago

He was killed by the oil industry, with a plan carried out by George HW Bush