this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
540 points (90.9% liked)

Memes

54813 readers
1231 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world -3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You’ve been arguing against Marxists for not doing enough

I am saying that they don't help contribute much to overall leftist movements and their lack of willingness to at least vote helps minimize our overall impacts as well. Like you said it happens ever 2years and you can't spare an evening for it? Are you that busy... and still have not much to show for it?

We can do more than one thing at a time and it is foolish to ignore elections completely.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I am saying that they don’t help contribute much to overall leftist movements

How so? The overwhelming majority of groups that have succeeded in establishing socialism have been Marxists. No electoralist progressives have been capable of establishing socialism and solidifying it, ever.

and their lack of willingness to at least vote helps minimize our overall impacts as well

Marxists do vote, though. As I already proved, PSL runs campaigns. Marxists do not think it is useful for anything other than exposure, however, which is why Marxists stress how important it is to actually do stuff like organizing.

Like you said it happens ever 2years and you can’t spare an evening for it?

If someone can't, there's no reason to scold them for it, as it doesn't make a practical difference.

Are you that busy… and still have not much to show for it?

I don't know what you mean by this, Marxists have established socialism in numerous countries and control the largest economy in the world by PPP. This is far more than any electoralist has achieved.

We can do more than one thing at a time and it is foolish to ignore elections completely.

Nobody is saying to, though, just that electione cannot bring positive change.

If you personally are not organizing in real life, and instead just voting and hoping other people do all of the hard work for you, then you aren’t doing anything at all.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world -3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Marxists do vote, though. As I already proved, PSL runs campaigns. Marxists do not think it is useful for anything other than exposure, however, which is why Marxists stress how important it is to actually do stuff like organizing.

And yet we have individuals like you asking people to just skip out and being counter productive to our overall movements. Show up anyway bud, its only an evening every 2 years (if you are american, but that doesn't change my point)

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Show me exactly where I say we should skip out entirely. Show me exactly how I am being counter-productive.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world -3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Show me exactly where I say we should skip out entirely. Show me exactly how I am being counter-productive.

And you won't get the results you want because you don't show up to vote. Aka, you are being counter productive to your own ends.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I did not say we should skip out on voting there, I said voting is not emphasized by Marxists due to not being capable of delivering results. I don't know why you think that after centuries of reformists trying to vote for positive change that it will finally happen. Look at Allende, he was voted in and then immediately coup'd for it by Pinochet and the US Empire. Revolution is necessary.

Please show me one example of electoralism resulting in socialists taking power and being able to solidify it. Just one. Please also explain why you believe that this time it will be different and finally work.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world -3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

ook at Allende, he was voted in and then immediately coup’d for it by Pinochet and the US Empire. Revolution is necessary.

A revolution could also be coup'ed therefore we should not make one by your own logic.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

No? The point is that taking the system over on a strictly legal basis leaves the institutions intact that can revert it to capitalism. We learned this back at the Paris Commune, and learned it again with Allende. Revolution is necessary because we must smash the state and replace it with a socialist one, we cannot merely take hold of a capitalist state and morph it into a socialist one.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world -3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The point is that taking the system over on a strictly legal basis

You can't because you don't vote.

You can't otherwise because your movement can't even coordinate (or is to apathetic) to vote; much less to storm the capital.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You can’t because you don’t vote.

I did vote in the last election, and do vote. You're insistent on lying about the position of others even after we tell you. Further, you cannot take over the system legally and resist reversion, I'd love for you to give a single counter-example to what I already explained with the Paris Commune, Allende, etc.

You can’t otherwise because your movement can’t even coordinate (or is to apathetic) to vote; much less to storm the capital.

That's like saying the Marxist movement is apathetic to building the world's largest sand castle. Storming the capital isn't going to do anything at the moment because there isn't a clear vanguard party and the revolutionary moment isn't yet here, and even if everyone voted Marxist it still wouldn't change the system.

Are you allergic to addressing this?

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world -2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So your saying that MLs care so much they can't spare an afternoon?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

No, and the fact that you keep making the same false accusation speaks volumes. Do you know how many days MLs give up organizing, year round?

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world -2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Its not an accusation if you are putting this much energy into telling me why elections don't matter. At least do the minimum there and encourage your fellow MLs to do so.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 hours ago

The minimum is to encourage everyone to actually organize, voting is secondary at best to that.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Picking between two bourgeois parties is when the election doesn't really matter. I'm an anarchist and I'd rather vote for the MLs running in the margins than waste my vote on some capitalist

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world -2 points 10 hours ago

Your privilege is showing