this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
1086 points (98.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

30289 readers
1811 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I use arch btw

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] maxmalrichtig@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Arch comments in 3, 2, 1 ...

[–] reabsorbthelight@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

So you've all heard about rolling in your grave, but have you heard about rolling releases? No? Well it works like ....

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I came in here to say “Arch, btw” but now I don’t wanna.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 21 hours ago

Fine, Hannah Montana it is then.

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

People are boasting about Arch, but my first open-source OS was FreeBSD 4.2, fitting on a single CD-ROM.
It included a tiny base system and C compiler, and practically every other package had to be compiled from source, using the ports system, which was just a collection of makefiles, one for each package.
And you had to be careful to use gmake instead of make, because the default Make was BSD-specific tool incompatible with most of open-source software, which targeted Linux. And you had to make sure to use GNU versions of grep, sed, and awk, and remove all bashisms from shell scripts, because /bin/sh was of course incompatible with bash.
You had only about 50% chance that a given package would compile. Package manager? What package manager? Just run suand then make install.
And my PC was AMD K6, and it had Turbo button, which did absolutely nothing. And I was very proud of my TEAC CD drive.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

and it had Turbo button, which did absolutely nothing

These old 'turbo' buttons actually did do something -- they limited your CPU clock speed.

Because some old games (and perhaps other software) relied on counting CPU cycles for timing the game. The faster your CPU, the faster the game would run, and the faster things in the game would happen. When CPUs got too fast for this, such games became unplayable because everything was happening in such fast-forward speed that the player could never hope to keep up. The counter-intuitively named 'turbo' button would bridge a jumper on the motherboard and change your CPU clock speed to a lower value, slowing it down so these old style games could still run at a reasonable, playable pace.

Ironically enough, the 'turbo' button made your PC slower.

(Personally, I think turbo buttons are due for a comeback, but as fan control options. Use a 'turbo' button to switch between fan control profiles -- turbo off for quiet profile, turbo on for maximum performance profile.)

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

The PC case with Turbo button was originally 486-DX, but there was no place on the new K6 motherboard to plug it into.

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Arch-based, the path you choose, btw? Good.
Big endeavour it is.
Closer to the Force, you'll feel... the more you learn.

[–] Lawnman23@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

The turbo button actually slowed down the pc.

https://www.howtogeek.com/678617/why-did-the-turbo-button-slow-down-your-pc-in-the-90s/

EDIT: Replied to the wrong post, fuck it, it stays as is.