this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
1540 points (97.8% liked)
Programmer Humor
30328 readers
3094 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You must know that's not actually how it works, often the funds can't be pulled back like that and instead the bank takes the hit. That is something that could be done with crypto as well.
That's not what a bank run is, that's just a rug pull, and yes I agree there are a lot of scam coins that people fall for, that's not an indictment of the idea of crypto as a whole.
A bank run is when the bank does not literally have the money owed to depositors because they lend it out. (Or other means) and if too many attempt to withdraw at once they literally can not give people their money.
That's a completely different situation and it concerns me you think they're the same.
That's not a feature of the currency itself, it's a forced regulation due to bad behvior of the industry prior where people lost money. Again this could be done with a cryptocurrency as well with proper regulations in place.
I never claimed it was, I said it was opaque. We can't know how many dollars are actually printed/in circulation compared to how much total is being "held" in banks.
I said cash, and have continued to reference cash, going back to the original BTC whitepaper the point has always been cash analogue with the ability to do more due to it being digital. It can't completely replace regulation and consumer protection just like cash couldn't without external enforcement.
He was defrauded by the people who stole the money, but he wasn't scammed (going back to my previous point that these two words do not mean the same thing). My point was that the bank didn't "get the money back" they made him whole by taking the hit. Again that's not a feature of credit cards or currency, it's an external institution and regulation above them to enforce that. Again something I think should be done with crypto as well.
Your edit isn't fraud, it's scamming lol, there's articles showing the people who paid in the most got things from Trump, quid pro quo basically and the rubes who bought in for less thinking dear leader wouldn't rugpull them.
There seems to be a fundamental disconnect here.
The things you cite as positives for existing credit card/banking institutions did not magically appear out of thin air, nor did they start that way.
It takes time, regulations and knowledge for those things to be put in place, I'm all for that.
I also think shitcoins are scams, just like midnight infomercial products are mostly scams. Its not a hard concept to understand that commerce itself isn't a scam but some do fake commerce to scam or defraud people. The same is true for crypto, projects like BTC (I could go on a whole tangent about how it's been coopted and ruined but I won't) and ETH had actual usecases whereas doge/Litecoin/whatevercoin did not.
That is exactly how it works. A credit card isn't a debit card. I have had my card number stolen. I saw weird charges on my card, called my credit card company and they reversed those charges immediately. No arguing was necessary because credit card companies work for you. Again this is a credit card, not a bank debit card.
It can't be done with crypto because you are transferring direct. You would need someone in between in which case you have reinvented banking.
I'm getting the impression you aren't in the US or British and don't speak English natively. This could be why we are having problems communicating.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fraud
Ok do you understand how that actually works for the bank? I'm not questioning the end user impact lmao, I'm telling you what happens to the bank itself, please explain to me how if someone uses your stolen card to get cash before the fraud is noticed the bank magically gets that cash bank from the one who stole it.
The answer is, they don't, they have insurance and such and make you whole that way.
You don't actually, there could be a fund paid for via taxes or similar to aide people who've been scammed/defrauded while the criminal activity is investigated and punished by authorities, just like right now with traditional currencies.
I'm from Texas, I am a licensed financial professional lmao. There is literally a difference in practice between a scam and fraud.
Fraud is an umbrella term, scams fall inside it. So I'm being pedantic and pointing out the differences in behavior between a generic fraud (such as your identity stolen or using your card pretending to be you in other examples) and scamming (things like ICO rugpulls, midnight infomercial jewelry, I'd argue "mystics" and megachurches)
Edit: To your point tho, it does still fall into the fraud category, but it helps to be more clear about what specific bad behaviors are being done to properly identify potential solutions IMO.