this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
617 points (99.5% liked)

politics

29000 readers
2544 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The account is an example of how artificial intelligence is being used to push political agendas in wartime

MAGA has been swooning over photos of a blonde U.S. Army soldier, walking defiantly alongside President Donald Trump to carry out the America First agenda. But there’s just one problem — she’s AI.

Images most likely generated by artificial intelligence depicted Jessica Foster wearing heels on a U.S. warship in the Strait of Hormuz, posing for selfies with Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, and giving a speech at the president’s “Board of Peace” event earlier this year.

The account, which has since been taken down, gained more than one million followers since its mysterious creator started posting on it four months ago, The Washington Post reports.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 112 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Any MAGA who fell for this is beyond stupid (plus utterly unfamiliar with the military). Her uniform is wrong (skirt WAYYY too high). No one wears dress uniforms underway at sea in general, ESPECIALLY an enlisted soldier (who would likely be nowhere near a ship, even more especially in dress uniform). The ribbons on her dress uniform not only change from picture to picture, but are also the wrong size (sometimes) and not even actual US ribbons. I've never seen a regulation name tag say "US ARMY" and not a name. The undershirt in her camis isn't regulation. And this was just a quick look at the photos and only tangentially around the Army at work.

Oh and that's before the visible glitches because it's AI. This is laughably low effort.

EDIT: Damn, they didn't even use a real ship as the background. It's supposed to be a destroyer, and there are no US destroyers with an aft-facing bridge or part of the superstructure forward of the bridge windows. Just truly WTF

EDIT 2.0: I just saw a couple other photos because I got curious. One has her as a one-star general 😂, and a couple others have her wearing a (shitty looking) Combat Infantry Badge, which is only awarded for being in combat. So, I guess women CAN hack it in combat! Hegseth must be in shambles.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

https://m.xkcd.com/2501/

The only thing that stood out to me was the high heels and skirt instead of proper trousers.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She's hot and it's pro-Trump. Why should they care if it's real or not if it tickles their...confirmation bias?

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

Yes, people are really overthinking this. These are enthusiastic Trump voters. It’s not like they voted for Trump, but are otherwise intelligent, rational people in all other respects. The same disordered thinking that led to their voting choices impacts every aspect of their lives.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 11 points 1 day ago

Even without the technical knowledge of military uniforms, one look at any of these and my mind is just screaming "probably fake".

IDK why exactly.

I think it's mostly that she's so young and beautiful and doesn't have that vapid dead-behind-the-eyes look that most MAGA women do. She looks like a happy vivacious young woman, not like a highly decorated military officer.

IDK how to say this but if women like her actually existed we would already be overrun with real photos of them in the oval office.

The other red flags that don't require technical knowledge that trip the "probably fake" alert buzzer:

Who takes a selfie with POTUS in the oval office?

Why is she wearing a crop top that looks like it's from cost-co?

Why is she standing around on a ship in high heels looking serious?

Why is she walking around on a military base with Trump without the usual entourage?

[–] lemjukes@sopuli.xyz 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The literal first photo in the article has the American flag patch on her arm backwards. Not flipped like a mirrored image, like the “physical object” is constructed backwards….

[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Of all the things in the photos that actually made sense. It's weird, though, and threw me for a loop when I first saw uniforms and such and had to ask back then.

On uniforms, vehicles, etc. the flag is sometimes "backwards" so that the union (the blue and stars) are "forward facing." The idea is that the flag is flown from the left side in normal orientation, so the union is closest to the pole. If the person or vehicle were carrying a real flag, based on what side a person is observing, the flag may be "mirrored." In other words, the flag is moving with the person or vehicle and not the opposite way. You'll see that orientation a lot on American military and para-military uniforms.

I never understood why we don't just put a normal oriented flag on the opposite shoulder for the same effect, but hey...America is weird.

[–] lemjukes@sopuli.xyz 1 points 19 hours ago

I admit my ignorance and appreciate the correction. But now I’m just also annoyed at how stupid that sounds.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

How about high heels on a carrier...

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 6 points 1 day ago

Thanks for all the checks

[–] plyth@feddit.org -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Any MAGA who fell for this is beyond stupid

What if hardly anybody did but Democrats are ready to believe that Republicans are this stupid. Divide and Conquer.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They are already that stupid for being maga in the first place.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 4 hours ago

Wanting to make America great again is good. The problem is that they don't understand that it is a lie. I think it's stupid to hate them and let the elite harvest their hopes instead of talking to them and winning them over for a better society.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You can literally see them losing their shit on its IG dude.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

If only there were some way you could find out....

[–] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 20 hours ago

If only I would need to click to know that it's not millions and only is a self-selected group of thirsty frustrated people.