this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
755 points (99.1% liked)

News

36744 readers
2526 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TSA employees have been working without pay during a partial shutdown of DHS over demands to reform immigration enforcement.

More than 400 Transportation Security Administration workers have quit since a partial government shutdown that began on Feb. 14 left them working without pay, the Department of Homeland Security said.

Funding was shut off to DHS over demands by Democrats for reforms at Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection following alleged abuses and the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens by federal agents in Minneapolis earlier this year.

There has also been a national callout rate of 10% at TSA on more than half the days of the last week, Lauren Bis, acting assistant secretary for public affairs at DHS, said Saturday in response to questions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today -1 points 22 hours ago

Stop that. You are trying to sound normal in this post, acting like you are having a perfectly normal experience, but you were super dramatic in your first post, describing TSA agents who were "screaming," shoving, etc. I wasn't being combative, I was responding to your over the top descriptions of TSA experiences, that don't match ANYTHING I've ever seen in any airport in America.

For instance, in this post you say:

I've never had a random security check by non TSA, and when they do inspect my luggage they neatly repack it and close it.

Very reasonable. But in your original post, you said:

Have you had to deal with agents asking you what's in your bag and screaming at you not to touch it as if it contained a bomb that you're doing to activate? Oh no your toothpaste and USB charger overlapped in the x-ray and looked like an IED! Then they shove everything back in your bag so it doesn't close and tell you to move it so they can deal with the next suspect, and the only place to repack your bag is on a bench 15 feet away?

That is in direct conflict with your supposed personal experience, so which is it? If you've had normal experiences with TSA, why were you trying to spread nonsense about abusive behavior that you've never experienced? And what is wrong with me countering your dramatic first post with my normal experiences, which turn out to mirror your second experience?

And you accuse me of being combative, when you go on some incomprehensible rant where you half agree with me, and half don't, start interrogating me about feeling safe about my shoes or belt or something, I don't get it. Like this:

And to be clear, I've had experiences where they went above and beyond, maybe they're new and haven't stopped giving a shit yet, or maybe they're just rays of sunshine. But it's not standard practice to be polite and helpful in the most standardized security theater in the world, and that's a problem.

So they're nice to you sometimes, and not nice to you sometimes. Who cares? They're doing their job as security, and you're doing your job as a traveler. Why do they have to live up to some personal standard? They see thousands of people a day. Are they supposed to read everybody's minds and treat them the way they like? I don't expect that, I just expect them to do their job, that's all. They don't have to smile for me, too, that's just condescending, and gross.

Do I feel safer? I don't know, I don't really think about it, and that answers your question.

Look, it's real simple: Before the 90s, hijacking were out of control world wide. American security improved until it was pretty good by the 90s. Then 9/11 happened, and they realized that the threat was getting worse, with the rise of Al Qaeda, and they enhanc d their security. The result has been a 25 year hiatus since the last hijacking.

That's success right there. It's obviously working, so whatever they have to do, I'm willing to be cooperative about it. My home airports are two of the busiest in the world, and I never have any issues. I show up early, take my time, do my thing at security, help less experienced travelers if they need it, and move on. I have never witnessed these dramatic problems that people have seem to have, despite being in some of the most crowded airports in the world.

The result is that I don't have die in a hijacking. Isn't that the ultimate objective? So what's everybody whining about?