this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

142 readers
5 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bjohnsonarch@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Table when organized by Points per Match

1.553 - Sheffield Un

1.546 - West Brom

1.502 - Leeds

1.500 - Middlesbrough

1.492 - Leicester

1.488 - Birmingham

1.474 - Wolves

1.450 - Norwich

1.442 - Blackburn

1.438 - Burnley

1.430 - Derby

1.418 - Fulham

1.417 - Preston NE

1.402 - Sheffield W

1.396 - Stoke

1.385 - Cardiff

1.367 - Nottingham F

1.352 - Blackpool

1.340 - Millwall

1.316 - Hull

1.308 - Charlton

1.306 - Bristol

1.301 - Grimsby

1.261 - Barnsley

[–] tkdyo@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Preston mid table no matter which way you sort it.

[–] frenchbud@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thanks I was here for that, considering the difference in games played that should be the default sorting value if you want to make an all-time table that means something

[–] bjohnsonarch@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Plus, the one major caveat I would add to both charts is that the English Football League changed to the 3-point win scheme in 1981-1982 season, so I have no idea how that would influence the points per game calculation to make a true all-time table. OP's table, provided from the link in this post, calculates the points total using the 3-point scheme.

[–] BrotherSeamus@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that should be the default sorting value

That would be a totally different chart. Spurs and the Manchester teams would be sorted to the top on far fewer matches played.

[–] frenchbud@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah true, making them the all-time better championship sides, on average per match. But that doesn't make much sense, so set a minimum of matches played and you're good