this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
63 points (98.5% liked)

Videos

18314 readers
103 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed
  9. AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I get the 2nd point is inaccurately assumed, but it's a going point to possibly bring up just really just how much fossil fuel is being burned by the factory in travel alone.

If you need the electricity of a whole city, then every day those cars are burning that much.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I even had my work as an example - we have 8 chargers, 30a level 2. That’s lower than many of us get at home

….. but that’s the point where a better goal should be to just make up for energy used by the commute. The reality is most of us move cars at lunch time. 8 fairly low end chargers is sufficient to top off 16 cars in a standard workday, and that’s without “smart” chargers that can rebalance when some cars use less

That factory didn’t need bigger chargers, and could easily halve that if you don’t expect people to share