this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
566 points (97.5% liked)
Technology
84105 readers
4014 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Please everyone read or at least skim articles before posting. The article literally says, that it's "an honest bump" to allow typical usage like web browsing and multitasking.
NEVER!
I bet your comment said something, so I upvoted it
But that requires actually READING 😖 /j
Downvoted, textwall!
/j
Tldr pls?
🔻
Web browsing is the real murder here.. and i dont want to know how much memory is solely spent on ads
The week after GDPR went into effect was amazing. Almost nobody was ready, so they just turned off all their ads and tracking for European IPs while they figured it out. Pages loaded pretty much instantly.
None if you use a good adblocker, like you should be doing.
I thought ad blockers just blocked ads from showing, not that they stopped them from being downloaded...
No, if it's a good blocker it's blocking all requests and connections to wherever the ads are being served from. There's usually ALSO a level of cosmetic filtering for things that get past the blocklist or can't be properly filtered because they're coming from the same server as stuff you actually want to see, but with ublock origin set to strict and noscript set to allow only whitelisted sites, my page load times are way faster. Sometimes a shitty webpage will still 'wait around' for a second to try and get a connection from an ad site but it's not loading anything into memory.
I'm concerned about in-system bloat because I read the linked article.
The desktop itself isn't the only reason that you need more RAM, but it's definitely one of them.
But that's not honest.
Ubuntu's default browser, and other apps, are snap-based. They take significantly more resourced than their Debian counterparts.
They don't take significantly more RAM
If a snap is bundled with it's own dependencies (the point of snap), those dependency libraries are not loaded into shared memory. Multiple apps that would typically share a loaded dependency must now each load them into RAM.
so use a lighter-weight de (xfce, lxqt, budgie), and don't go crazy with brower tabs or open applications, and you'll be ok.. like you're probably already doing now if you've got a 'marginal' pc.
Correct.
I totally get it but with the current rampocalypse I'd delay it just for the optics alone
Might as well bump it to 64 GB and an LLM chip since in 5 years' time people might like Copilot & Friends spying a bit less on them.