this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
52 points (100.0% liked)

PieFed Meta

4668 readers
84 users here now

Discuss PieFed project direction, provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics.

Wiki

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I posted about this a week ago:

Currently, instance bans and community bans are treated as two separate things. When a user is banned from an instance, you’ll often see in the logs a bunch of community bans alongside it at once (at least from Lemmy communities). These are communities that user has posted on. An instance ban automatically applies hard-bans to communities they have interacted in from that instance. But the problem here is its only communities they’ve interacted in.

The instance ban itself is simply a rejection of federation. It doesn’t block users from posting in communities on that instance - only the community bans do that. It just means their posts won’t federate out. This means that an instance banned user can continue to be a nuisance in most communities (or all, if they are pre-emptively banned) on an instance locally - and the moderators of that community and instance won’t even know because they don’t view their community from there. With larger numbers of users would also mean larger amounts of trolls and incompatible users, which could greatly increase the chance of people simply vandalising communities and no-one even noticing.

Lemmy 1.0 promises to fix this apparently from their end, but I think at least for as Piefed is concerned we could get in on this first. We need a hard block on all Piefed accounts from being to interact on any community that is from an instance they are bannedfrom. We also need a way before that for Piefed based communities to automatically throw out all comments made even locally by instance banned accounts based from Lemmy.

It's now been implemented on the latest piefed. A Piefed user instance banned from anywhere will now be hard-banned from all communities on that instance to prevent them from being a local menace unbeknownst the moderators of those communities. But all Piefed instances need to update.

Ip2IcesF5VnjV3U.png

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skavau@piefed.social 15 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

This change has nothing to do with community moderators or community moderator bans, but instance bans. And it's plugging a gap in how instance bans federate - preventing a banned user from an instance from vandalising a community on their local instance.

It’s partly why lemmy/piefed hasn’t taken off, we need clear rules fairly enforced with an appeal system that ends in something like a Jury Trial of users to ascribe guilt.

This is outside the scope of this particular change. I've no problem with the idea of a modchat system that incorporates this stuff and provide users with a place to appeal bans, but it would more-or-less need to be built from the ground-up.

Although the idea of a 'jury trial' for bans would have to be an opt-in function. You can't make instances run their servers like that.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah I see, I still want my ideal to be put out there, but understand the need to keep the tankies at bay, seeing as I have first hand knowledge of them, and that they are across lemmy, not just on hexrat and ml. Don't get me wrong they have a lot of cool users, but their leadership is very much not cool, and I suspect the long palsied arm of russian intelligence.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 4 weeks ago

Well this is less about 'the tankies' and more trolls who, when instance banned, will still sometimes spam up the communities on the instance they are banned from. It won't federate, but it would still appear locally - and the community mods wouldn't know about it - because previously, an instance ban didn't equate to hard community bans, it just stopped federating out.