Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

142 readers

5 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@soccer.forum

rglullis

Chelsea FC face new questions over how Roman Abramovich funded success | Roman Abramovich (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by UglyWanKanobi@alien.top to c/main@soccer.forum

117 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Durantsthegoat@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We all knew their success was bullshit, let's hope this is the nail in the coffin that confirms it.

[–] TheLittleGinge@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Time to post another pathetic megathread on your sub.

[–] NotClayMerritt@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They can financially dope all they wish, but the players still have to perform, the manager still has to do a job. Money doesn’t buy competence or success.

[–] SpeechesToScreeches@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

You could say the same for chemical doping...

[–] Diallingwand@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

It clearly does. Believing that the wealthiest clubs aren't consistently they most successful is denying reality.

[–] DamoDuff11@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Arsenal fans had Usmanov owning their club for a long time and begged him to own it fully at times too so it’s always funny when they cry about Abramovich.

[–] 3500fp@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

And the former shareholders of the club refused to sell any more to him, and passed away before cashing out on a sale to avoid him taking over instead of Kroenke because of his character. Not the same situation at all