The blonde guy runs closer to them
SpeechesToScreeches
joined 1 year ago
"If, when a free kick is taken, an attacking team player is less than 1 m (1 yd) from a ‘wall’ formed by three or more defending team players, an indirect free kick is awarded."
Doesn't that apply here?
they don't really exist in the real world.
The fuck.
They're over-represented in the news because they're being used as a political tool by the right.
Just kick Chelsea and City out and it's sorted.
Doing your part for that
Joelinton being a nasty little cunt again. Who'd have thought
Isn't government interference banned by FIFA?
[Comment]: Premier League left with no option but to get tough with clubs accused of breaching rules
I don't want the extra titles
NGL I wouldn't mind Ole having more premier league trophies than Pep
You could say the same for chemical doping...
Nobody is bootlicking referees (outside of like one City fan I've had the pleasure of).
People dislike Arteta's petulance. And his rant was an example of that. The goal also was not that controversial, and especially compared to the shit other teams have been getting this season.
So to blow up over that just seems like a sore loser. He could have blown up over the Bruno G incident and would have likely been better received (though that would have drawn more attention to Havertz).
view more: next ›
Yeah it's not a 'we suspect they might have broken the rules again so will be punished again', just a 'Everton still have to play by the same rules despite already being punished for breaking them before', it's a non story