Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Oof, I really wouldn't.
The main issue is weight distribution. You're looking at a very imbalanced fulcrum here, with the foot (which is usually mounted to the desk, therefore providing more stability) needing to be super heavy to counter the weight of the monitors.
Even a lightweight monitor - say, a ~2kg one (my 34" Samsung ultrawide OLED, which has its PSU completely separate), would put enough weight on it that any kind of movement would risk tipping this entire structure over.
The reason why it's so expensive is because 1, it's a very niche product and 2, because it's so risky to use on anything larger than a dual 17" setup.
If you want to DIY, of course you can go with a pole on a rolling stand and then buy individual pole mount arms for the monitors... but you'll need to make the base super heavy. we're talking at least 15-20kg, a big concrete block with some lead blocks embedded, or using the base as a weight rack for workouts, to prevent tipping.
Alternatively, have you considered replacing your monitors with AR glasses? Something like the Rokid/Xreal/Viture brands' offerings. They can do both fixed monitor (the entire glass display is a single monitor so it's always in front of you), as well as virtual monitor (one to five monitors arranged in a virtual space anchored to the glasses' position but not orientation so you can look away from them). We're talking a $300-400 expense for a much more portable experience with no DIY.
Yeah, the mechanical part of this is easy enough, but unless you make the stand out of wolfram and ridiculously big, it's gonna topple.
I think fixing it on a linear bearing is the only way.
It doesn't necessarily have to topple. I have my ~10kg TV on a similar stand and even though the main vertical element is off center, it's super stable.
My main concern is that OP's approach is with two - potentially different size/weight) monitors, with movable arms, which does mean the center of weight moves around a lot with every change.
Oh man, there's a whole world that I know absolutely nothing about. My immediate concern is resolution and latency - I use my computer for gaming mostly, would these have a look and feel on screen similar to a decent monitor?
Second concern... I'd kinda hate to even support that product line. The concept is good for what I'm asking about, but these things are a security and privacy nightmare in general. Mine would never leave the home, but even just buying a pair would feel like making a deal with a serial voyeurism sex offender. Is there a brand that doesn't have the sketchy camera?
Resolution is a pretty standard 1080p@90Hz for most devices. For your purpose I guess a single fixed monitor setup would be ideal, as multimonitor setups mean you can't get both screens in your view, and it increases latency too.
general latency in single monitor mode is pretty okay though, around 12-16ms on most models I tried. Not as good as a dedicated monitor, but it's a solution. A lot of people use these glasses with slabtops (generally macbooks with the display torn off), handhelds (Switch, Steam Deck, etc.), and other on the go devices.
Most of Xreal's models don't have cameras. And you're not forced to use their software, by default 99% of these devices works as a simple DisplayPort device + USB hub for the attached accessories (microphone, speaker, camera).