this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Watches
0 readers
1 users here now
A community for watch & horology discussion.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Mechanical tool watches are an oxymoron. A G shock will outperform any 25k watch.
I think the term “tool watch” is more historical than describing present day use case
True, but often people market and discuss them as if they are meant to be tools. A lot of people care a lot about specs and performance and certification in regards to precision, water resistance, etc
True, I don't get why they're called tool watches anymore (some, ever). They're luxury items with a sporty design and that's fine, but taking a picture chopping wood with your TT GMT because it's "meant to be worn" feels desperate for group acceptance
I agree wholeheartedly, though I raise you Rado. Another contentious take on this sub..
100%-- I want a Sinn-level build quality chronograph with a quartz movement
Speedmaster x-33 is the way forward
Yay for functionality, but nay for form-factor or design language IMO-- I would love it if I could afford it as a 5th watch or sth, but for example the entire sinn or seiko prospect line should be HAQ if they want to be tool watches.
My hot take is that people with this hot take are just looking for things to complain about. It's just a way to label a style of watch. It's like saying "calling a chronometer a chronometer is dumb because all watches measure time and that's what chronometer means."
A dive computer will outperform any dive watch, so should we just stop using the term dive watch? No because it's a useful way to categorise the style of watch that every understands
I'm not complaining, I just think it's a little silly to talk about the practicality of watches that are inherently inpractical. The labeling isn't what I'm talking about. It's about how some people talk about the watches. Liking submariners or speedmasters or something because one appreciates their beauty, craftsmanship, history, etc is one thing, but talking up their performance specs is another. Here's an example of what I'm talking about
A G Shock will do every one of those functionalities singfiicantly better so it's just funny to me to have that be the sort of sales pitch.