this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
45 points (97.9% liked)
science
26630 readers
614 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
dart board;; science bs
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Years ago, I read a research news item about having looked at gut-cells, after an ultrasound, & finding that they were having an abnormally elevated death-rate.
Anybody who understands that if that holds, if ultrasound stresses cells in an unnatural way which is actually-significant, even only slightly, that having all babies ultrasounded might be a stupid idea?
anybody who knows some of the history of the X-Ray, knows that Marie Curie's corpse is kept in a lead coffin, because it's too radioactive,
& that medical-X-rays NOW are drasticlly lower-energy than what they were in the 1900's ( new machines, anyways ).
I expect the same to be true of ultrasound machines: less energy, for the same view..
The point of this, though, is that the ONLY study I know-of which looked at whether cell-death is increased by ultrasound, discovered that yes, it is, & .. nobody cared??
That's the wrong response.
_ /\ _