science

"So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous—whether it's ultraviolet or just very powerful light, and I think you said that hasn't been checked, but you're going to test it. And then I said supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you're going to test that too. Sounds interesting."

"And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that."

• Dr Jesus Trump

Extremely cool. And slightly scary. They were able to control the direction the mouse went with basically a remote controller! And apparently control gene expressions?

Cells already create light by themselves. Only a unnoticeable little bit but they do.

Years ago, I read a research news item about having looked at gut-cells, after an ultrasound, & finding that they were having an abnormally elevated death-rate.

Anybody who understands that if that holds, if ultrasound stresses cells in an unnatural way which is actually-significant, even only slightly, that having all babies ultrasounded might be a stupid idea?

anybody who knows some of the history of the X-Ray, knows that Marie Curie's corpse is kept in a lead coffin, because it's too radioactive,

& that medical-X-rays NOW are drasticlly lower-energy than what they were in the 1900's ( new machines, anyways ).

I expect the same to be true of ultrasound machines: less energy, for the same view..

The point of this, though, is that the ONLY study I know-of which looked at whether cell-death is increased by ultrasound, discovered that yes, it is, & .. nobody cared??

That's the wrong response.

_ /\ _