this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
85 points (97.8% liked)
Map Enthusiasts
6098 readers
5 users here now
For the map enthused!
Rules:
-
post relevant content: interesting, informative, and/or pretty maps
-
be nice
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It was considered by some, I believe. This author wanted to avoid displacing anyone, though. Of course, many in Germany at that time were guilty in some way, so it would have been justifiable. But it would have always been a cause for tension, which, no matter how justified or morally right it would have been, in practice would lead to tensions similar to those in Israel/Palestine today.
Displacing white people. Taking the land of indigeneous people seems totally okay.
As if jews are not indigeneous to that region
The arctic circle?
Yeah, a few of those options are wild and super cold.
Indigenous identity is tied to historical and biological continuity with a specific territory, rather than religious affiliation alone. Zionists who made the state has no proof of being descendent of the israelites
Anybody who is jewish with mother and father that are also jewish are given the right to live in the west bank by stealing a palestinian house
No country would have accepted a state to be forced on their land. Gemrnqy still make the most sense since Germany surrended
idk. i would belive most germans would have apprechiated a second chance even under a new flag (allied states or isreal). also i am no scolar in thia at all so feel free to provide soirces to teach me, but wernet the palastinean people promised the lnd thats now isreal to join the wareffort on the side of the allies? thats what i was tought before. so this seems even more explosive than resettleing germany. i mean germans dont even need to move. but accept a new jewisch goverment.