Map Enthusiasts

I see your point. But I believe there would have been a good chance of it turning out like the U.S. when they finally did away with slavery. (Yes, I know different forms of slavery were drafted and implemented before it was outlawed. However, the sure count of people that were in slavery of any kind in the U.S., greatly decreased the decade following. It's still morally wrong. But that's a reality the U.S. and other countries lived and breathed back then.) I would worry that some form of Jim Crow laws would come about, after more Jewish people returned. (This does have me interested in learning more about how the Jewish people were treated over a decade, after the Nazi party fell in Germany. If anyone can point me in the right 'direction,' it would be much appreciated.) I'm not a historian, nor Israel expert. But I am a person wanting to learn more about the world's accurate history.

That would’ve set Germany back to 1933 basically. The fastest way to get their right wing to overtake the entire spectrum again, despite what just happened.

It was considered by some, I believe. This author wanted to avoid displacing anyone, though. Of course, many in Germany at that time were guilty in some way, so it would have been justifiable. But it would have always been a cause for tension, which, no matter how justified or morally right it would have been, in practice would lead to tensions similar to those in Israel/Palestine today.

The idea of settling Jews in the land of their murderers is preposterous. How could Jews feel safe living right next to their killers?

It would also completely validate the antisemitic thoughts of Hitler, that he had fought the war against the Jews. Jews literally getting German territory after the war proves this.

Keep in mind that Zionists claimed Palestine was "uninhabited" as well.

"A land without a people for a people without a land".

Idk, Zionism is already kinda defeatist and antisemetic to begin with in its foundation. And later parts sound much more like it was written by a jewish person, such as "Dignity instead of sympathy." I say this because zionism is rooted in the belief jewish people can never and will never be accepted anywhere, and that they need their own nation to have somewhere safe. So with that in mind, I could see how this was written by a jewish zionist. Not that it isnt possible it wasnt, just that I feel there is reason to believe it was.

Which I can understand why this belief came into being, but I definitely dont agree with it. Nationalism and religious intolerance is why antisematism exists, so to me making a religious nation-state is like fighting fire with fire. You're not seeking equality, freedom, or acceptance, you're seeking somewhere where you're on top. Should be seeking a situation where no one is on top.

Edit: I tried searching the author, Joseph Hefter, to see if he was jewish but I cant find anything on him.

same way that modern Israel is accepting of mixing Pelstinian people with Israel?

If they settled in India, you would have a whole generation of disposed Indians being ethnically cleansed.

New York, or Washington DC?

North America has a very bad history with concentrating groups to certain regions

I found this write up.

https://bigthink.com/strange-maps/ten-jewish-homelands-outside-palestine/

Might bump into some old acquaintances

It looks like they were trying to avoid areas with significant existing/indigenous populations. The proposed size of roughly 50,000 square miles is slightly larger than Iceland is, and there would be a sizeable displaced or second-class local population, which it seems like this author was trying to avoid.

That's the catch right? Is there even a correct way to resettle a population? Ethnostates on some level with probably always just be broken.

But I'm glad op shared this. This seems to be a part of the Isreal discussion that gets walked past

Nothing in Queensland on the map. NT and SA.