this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
655 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

19943 readers
2330 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nonononoki@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I still cannot comprehend how the math and physics work. How can you calculate the trajectory of an object flying several times the speed of sound, millions of kilometers, with the duration on several weeks while being on a planet that moves even faster than that object?

EDIT: The Earth is rotating as well lol

[–] yogurt@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

The real answer is you can't, every time the astronauts take a piss it's throwing everything off. But they do know where San Diego is going to be, and they want to land the capsule off the coast of San Diego, so they keep making adjustments throughout the flight so they stay on course to hit the water at 8:07:27 because that's when San Diego is going to be there.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because all of it is expected and known. It would actually be a lot harder to calculate if it were something taking place just here on earth. You have to factor in stuff like wind and turbulence which throws calculations off. But in space? Little to no unexpected variables. It's Newton's first law; an object in motion stays in motion.

We know the position of the moon and how it will move.

We know the position of the earth and how it will move.

We know the position of the spacecraft and how it will move.

From there, it's just math.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

the three body problem though.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Artemis II did not contribute sufficient gravitational forces to be relevant.

[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's only because yo mama wasn't on board

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

The limit that the 3 body problem presents is that there is no exact solution, and inexact solutions will eventually desynchronize so much as to become worthless for predictions. But the key word is 'eventually' - if your initial measurements are good, there could be years (and in the case of the planets of the solar system, millions of years) worth of useful predictions.

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Ah you see, in space there is no sound, much simpler to calculate without it!

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

It took us a few thousand years to figure it out. No biggie.