this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
342 points (99.4% liked)

science

27191 readers
237 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

its like several hundred for out of pocket for shingrx for under 50year old. gardisil is not likely cheap other.

[โ€“] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, both are expensive out-of-pocket. That's part of the decision about why to not recommend gardisil (HPV vaccine) for the wider groups without the clinical outcomes to show the value. However, I addressed this in a later post in this thread, in the USA the ACA makes sure nearly all health insurance pays for recommended vaccines at 100%. So if you have insurance its most likely you can get gardisil or shingrex (for shingles) with zero out-of-pocket costs. I was surprised to see the retail price of Shingrex at $500, but I didn't pay a penny of that as it was fully covered.