this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
679 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

20237 readers
2161 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 151 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

30,000 is roughly 1/3 of 60,000,000.

VERY roughly. Lol

[–] DiarrheaSommelier@lemmy.ca 84 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Logarithmically scaled image. I'll leave the determination of the base of the Log as an exercise for the viewer.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would show my proof, but I don't have enough space in this margin

[–] Jamesian@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

I'm here for this comment all day.

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

well, we know bison in the middle are worth approximately 75 each...

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's what I thought, so I investigated.

The base of the log can be accounted for by a constant scale factor, because, for example, if n is the number of bison,

log10(n)
= log10(e^ln(n))
= ln(n) log10(e) and log10(e) is a constant.
This change of base is a linear scale on the logs.

Hence we can just take log 10 of the numbers of bison, and scale the answer by a constant factor which is log10(correct base), getting
7.778, 2.477 and 4.477
Scale that by about 2 = log10(100) to match the 5 bison in the middle pictogram, and there should be
16, 5, 9 bison on a logarithmic scale.

The diagram is also wrong if it's logarithmic.

[–] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

yeah this graphic is terrible

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 6 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, we need 799613 more bison images to justify the graphic.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's only off by roughly 20,000,000