this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
489 points (98.8% liked)
Technology
84359 readers
3907 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Chinese AI labs kinda seem like a plot twist in LLM evolution. Their models are quite capable now. They're not at the levels of American labs' flagship models yet, but the gap has been narrowing quite a lot.
When OpenAI and Anthropic models are only marginally better, but much pricier, then I would think they'll gradually shed users (followed by investors).
Ironically, I could imagine a possibility of Nvidia "saving" American AI. If they can take the lead with Nemotron (in like a "post-OpenAI/Anthropic" future when open-source models dominate), then maybe they can survive on chip sales... Though they'd probably have to compete with Chinese chips at that point.
I don't plan on forgiving Nvidia or Micron or anyone else who sold us out to get in on the debt transfer scam that is propping up the US economy, the bubble will burst, and I hope they all go down in flames with it.
Chinese Big Tech isn’t really known for innovation, they take existing tech and push to make it more efficient by just throwing people at the problem. It’s basically because they have a culture where critical thinking is not welcome. Makes it difficult to think outside the box. It’s why they still haven’t gotten an EUV machine out of the prototyping phase
Their only real innovative industry is their battery industry.
This is a racist fairy tale that will get you pwned.
This is the same racist bs we told ourselves about the Japanese and then the Koreans. Obviously only Americans have the Innovation Gene
Innovation under Pressure: China’s Semiconductor Industry at a Crossroads
...
Remind me, again. Who else was experimenting with deep ultraviolet (DUV) lithography at scale prior to 2024? Who else was a front-runner in developing and deploying system-on-a-chip or AI embedding?
That's before you get into the EV sector, SMRs for bulk shipping, or the Chinese airplane and aerospace development.
India, Korea, and Japan have all been in a scramble to keep up with the Chinese industrial programs. Meanwhile the US/EU don't even seem to bother trying.
This is moronic and entirely divorced from the facts. Look at key players in the Chinese LLM space like Deepseek: it’s a tiny team of less than 200 people, building models that rival US tech firms with thousands. They make breakthroughs by pushing research first and intensive planning, rather than brute force. These are immensely innovative and creative teams with a great approach to R&D and engineering above all else
Well..those engineers were all training in the USA at MIT, Stanford, etc. but got the boot in 2025.
This wouldn’t really negate what I’m talking about in terms of their organizational advantages or the argument I’m making about them not just “throwing people” at the problem. But also, I don’t see any evidence that this is true; it seems their hiring strategy is to grab researchers that recently graduated from top Chinese universities as their talent
As far as I understand it is decently true, but not to the extent that they would be incapable of doing what they're achieving. Either way you're right, it doesn't refute your claims in any way - those researchers are still doing work in China for Chinese companies, regardless of where they got their education.
I doubt it's the "culture." It's just that they used to specialize in making things for the lowest cost possible. That's changing bit by bit. DJI is best in class for example; no other consumer product comes close. They are also leading in many scientific fields.