this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
31 points (91.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39454 readers
1528 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If not get rid of it, how to decrease it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wirelesswire@lemmy.zip 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As long as the internet remains easily accessible, you're not going to.

[–] arsCynic@piefed.social -4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

As long as the internet remains easily accessible, you’re not going to.

Let's say there's a news website that didn't allow any comments on their articles before, out of fear for bots, trolling, bullying, and other kinds of rotten behavior. At some point they implemented a way to comment that requires logging in with one's identity card, information that remains publicly unreadable/unavailable through a myriad of safeguards.

Considering the amount of bots and other bad actors, wouldn't this decrease the stench significantly?

[–] Watermark710@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

requires logging in with one’s identity card

Fastest way to get me to never use your site again. I'd rather deal with a few trolls and bots than have to give my ID to every site I want to interact with. That's some ridiculously invasive stuff right there. Turning every website into their own private Big Brother is the opposite of progress.

Plus, what about when the site's database inevitably gets compromised, and now my personal info is public?

[–] arsCynic@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago

This is an argument to an incomplete quotation that misrepresents the hypothetical; reading articles doesn't require ID, writing comments underneath them does.

Plus, what about when the site’s database inevitably gets compromised, and now my personal info is public?

Well, if you're not bullying other people in the comments I'd say you'd be fine. What if your hospital's database gets hacked and all your private health issues are public? Will you stop seeking healthcare in hospitals? The whole world is based on trust. Moreover, I'm pretty sure there are ways to do zero-knowledge encrypted ID card verification that doesn't require a database. Similarly to Amazon reviews, a comment could simply show "verified ID", but, retain no other information.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

they'd get less page views and lose revenue

the bots/trolls/bad actors make them more money than the casual user.

[–] arsCynic@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

they’d get less page views and lose revenue

No. The site never allowed comments before, they do after. ID is only necessary for commenting, not reading. So, losing revenue doesn't make sense. Also, not all websites exist to make revenue.

[–] wirelesswire@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That would just cause the bad actors to move elsewhere, or not be there in the first place, since they initially weren't allowed to comment. If every site implemented such measures and people just ignored the privacy and security issues, then you would have to trust that the site operators would act in good faith. Look at all the garbage on Facebook. FB keeps trolls and such around because they're good for engagement, and bad actor advertisers because they pay a lot of money.

[–] arsCynic@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Facebook. FB keeps trolls and such around because they’re good for engagement, and bad actor advertisers because they pay a lot of money.

Sounds like pretty good arguments in favor of per-site identity verification. On Facebook I obviously wouldn't, but there are some news websites where I definitely would.