this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
54 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
187 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
Los@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
54
Google’s nightmare “Web Integrity API” wants a DRM gatekeeper for the web (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by nils@feddit.de to c/technology@beehaw.org
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wiredfire@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Everyone going mad and many suggesting “if you have it use Safari instead!” when Apple implemented essentially this same thing quite some time ago in Safari 🤔

That said intentions are important. I have little faith that Big G’s goal is anything other than self servin.

[–] anlumo@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a very different thing when a browser with negligible market share does that.

[–] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Safari has over 20% browser market share. That isn't negligible.

[–] snw@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

Safari neglegibe? It accounts for about a third of US internet traffic and is the only browser you can even get on iOS (everything else there is forced to be just a reskin)

[–] evilviper@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any chance you have a link or source for this? I usually keep up on tech news but don't remember anything of this nature.

[–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] evilviper@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Thanks, that's interesting to read about. While I'm not a web developer, there would seem to be two very large differences between them.

  1. The Apple tokens were designed for a single purpose, reducing (or eliminating) CAPCHAs, with mobile devices especially in mind. It also is not a replacement, but rather an enhancement of an existing web standard.

  2. It's Apple, a company that makes their money by selling you things you actually want. Rather than Google, a company that gives you (or other companies) things (for free or discounted) so they can make money off of you.

It is especially obvious when Google has the literal first bullet-point in their "why we are developing this" as...

This trust is the backbone of the open internet, critical for the safety of user data and for the sustainability of the website’s business.

Followed by

These websites fund themselves with ads, but the advertisers can only afford to pay for humans to see the ads, rather than robots.

So yeah, Google can kindly go pound sand as far as I'm concerned.