this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
214 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

84807 readers
5066 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Software Freedom Conservancy taking some bold steps to push back against Bambu's blatant anti-consumerism via (amongst other tactics) violation of AGPLv3.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why not using donations to take them to court? Sue them and give money back to OG projects.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 5 points 14 hours ago

Part of the challenge here is that Bambu is a Chinese company. Which means you would have to sue them in China, with predictable results.

You could try to sue them in e.g. the US, then use that victory to secure things like import bans, but that's a very long, slow, and expensive process.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Until recently, it was thought that only the copyright holder(s) had legal standing, so unless you could convince them to get involved as the plaintiff you were screwed. I think recently they've come up with a legal theory by which any user who was refused the source code could have standing, but it's a new enough tactic that AFAIK it isn't very widespread or proven yet.

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 hours ago

It's risky AF in that it's so far without precedent, and thus could prove to be a complicated endeavor that could very well sap the progress of the former, if attached to those efforts. (IANALE)

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If they have a case a lawyer will take this for a share of the winnings. You need a few hundred first to send cease and desists, but if those letters don't work you just add court/lawyer costs to what you are asking.

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Some areas may even have systems in place that force the defendant (corp/co) to pay said legal costs outside/on top of the awarded sum.

see: wage theft, workers comp, fee-shifting provisions (freq. labor violations, discrimination claims, environmental law, consumer protection, IP, etc.)

That said, here's a relevant PSA, if that helps anyone here:

If you've experienced the following or similar issues with your employer:

  • not getting your full break(s) during a shift (eg. being asked to come back early "for the team"),
  • bathroom visits deducted from break time allotment,
  • breaks deducted from your check incorrectly (usually in said employer's favor)
  • tips "adjusted" for any reason, incl. non-tipped positions (eg. mgmt) taking a percentage,
  • wage "adjusted" by internal policy, despite local/state/federal requirements stating otherwise
  • OT unpaid "for reasons"
  • etc., etc.

... you should at least contact a local law firm specializing in employment/contract/labor law. Often enough, many will offer a free consultation to first clarify whether you have a case to work with, or what steps are still needed in order to move forward toward justice.

Keep in mind, fellow poors, there's no obligation for you to ultimately choose any attorney(s) you consult with (don't forget: start w/ free consults in this exploratory stage). FWIW, most of those that I've contacted over the decades seem personally driven to champion for us poors in their work. (Anecdotal, yes, but earnestly hoping it helps) Which may be related to the fact that it's the judgements against said shitheel corpos that the attorneys get their wages from, instead of their client, who's yet another victim of normalized, unchecked greed. ✊🏼