this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Photography

24 readers
1 users here now

A place to politely discuss the tools, technique and culture of photography.

This is not a good place to simply share cool photos/videos or promote your own work and projects, but rather a place to discuss photography as an art and post things that would be of interest to other photographers.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello, i’ve been a photographer for sometime now. I have my own instagram page, my own equipment, and i have already posted a bunch. Recently i got hired at an event agency (photo/video) and i get to shoot most of their events (parties, weddings… you name it)

My problem is as follows: They want me to use their editing style (presets and colors) and put their logo on everything i take. I understand that those are their clients and hence they have their brand to show. But the real problem is that even the pictures i take myself, outside work, let’s say i call a friend out or take pics of my girlfriend and want to post them on my page, they won’t let me post without their presets as well (for marketing purposes) and to associate me with them.

I really hate this, because i can’t be creative anymore.

They pay really good money, so idk what to do.

How would you guys handle this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sagittarrius-A@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Seems reasonable, did you sign a contract or consent that outlines willfull and unwillful usage of images? If not, speak to a legal professional and outline these stipulations. It's understandable if they pay good money(to your standards) then they are the buyer's. Our professional photography is only as the clients willingness to value it by buying. So I'd not have any complaints, Been doing this commercially for over a decade, and get paid we'll for it. Franky, I really don't care for the images they can keep it, it's the creative process that keeps me going. Getting paid to live day in and day out and get paid to do it? Thats just golden for me.

[–] RobArtLyn22@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, it’s not reasonable and you need to reread the post. They aren’t talking about controlling the images he is paid for. They are talking about controlling how he presents his personal work created on his own time.

[–] Sagittarrius-A@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Yep, I did read that. Which is what's creating a conflict of interest. Because as he's/ she's on a payroll all creation hitherto shall be deemed as org property. Speak to a legal advisor, and clearly stipulate willful and unwillful usage of images. It's a small matter but pricey if left untouched.